Saturday, June 15, 2019

The Great Conspiracy # 19


MODERN ISRAEL AT KADESH-BARNEA -- Ye shall know my breach of promise, the altering of my purpose. Num. 14:34b (margin) In his first letter to the Corinthians, the apostle Paul stated that the history of the wilderness experience of the children of Israel was written for the people of God as an example and warning against apostasy and rejecting the counsel of Jesus. In verses one through ten Paul reviewed how the children of Israel “murmured” against the Lord. “Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition,” Paul wrote, “upon whom the ends of the world are come.” (I Corinthians 10:11). The Lesson At Kadesh-Barnea The Lord led the children of Israel out of Egypt and into the wilderness by the hand of Moses. The Lord led the Advent Christians of William Miller’s day out of Spiritual Babylon by the Spirit of Prophecy in the form of a seventeen year old girl, Ellen G. Harmon. The Scriptures and the Spirit of Prophecy make it clear that the wilderness experience of the children of Israel is a lesson for the Remnant Church in the last days. The children of Israel lingered in the wilderness far too long. The Seventh-day Adventist Church also lingered in the wilderness far too long. The children of Israel lingered in the wilderness because of unbelief. (Hebrews 3:16-19; 4:1-11). The Seventh-day Adventists of the past century also lingered in this world because of Unbelief. “Ye have dwelt long enough in this mount,” the Lord said to Moses. “Turn you, and take your journey, and go to the mount of the Amorites, and unto all the places nigh thereunto, in the plain, in the hills, and in the vale, and in the south, and by the sea side, to the land of the Canaanites, and unto Lebanon, unto the great river, the river Euphrates. Behold, I have set the land before you: go in and possess the land which the Lord sware unto your fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, to give unto them and to their seed after them.” (Deuteronomy 1:6-8, emphasis supplied). “And when we departed from Horeb,” Moses wrote, “we went through all that great and terrible wilderness, which ye saw by the way of the mountain of the Amorites, as the Lord our God commanded us; and we came to Kadesh-barnea.” (Deuteronomy 1:19). I Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -398- After arriving at Kadesh-barnea the children of Israel decided to send twelve men (spies) to search out the land before they would make an attempt to enter. The names of the twelve men are listed in Numbers 13:4-15. The twelve returned and reported that, “We came unto the land whither thou sentest us, and surely it floweth with milk and honey; and this is the fruit of it.” (Numbers 13:27). However, they also observed that the land was filled with giants and the people were strong. “Nevertheless the people be strong that dwell in the land, and the cities are walled, and very great: and moreover we saw the children of Anak there,” the twelve reported. “The Amalekites dwell in the land of the south: and the Hittites, and the Jebusites, and the Amorites, dwell in the mountains: and the Canaanites dwell by the sea, and by the coast of Jordan.” (Numbers 13:28, 29). How did the children of Israel respond to this negative report? They murmured. (Numbers 14:2). That very night they made plans, not only that they would disobey the Lord and not go in and posses the land, but made plans to choose a new leader and return to Egypt. Today modern Israel has chosen “new” theology captains, and has returned to spiritual Babylon in the form of Ecumenical ties with the Roman Catholic Church and World Council of (Protestant) Churches. “Would God that we had died in the land of Egypt,” the congregation cried, “or would God we had died in this wilderness! And wherefore hath the Lord brought us unto this land, to fall by the sword, that our wives and our children should be a prey? Were it not better for us to return into Egypt?” (Numbers 14:1-3). Joshua and Caleb tried to calm the congregation and said, “The land, which we passed through to search it, is an exceeding good land. Let us go up at once and possess it; for we are well able to overcome it.” (Numbers 14:7; 13:30). Did the children of Israel respond to Joshua and Caleb? No. They were firm in their decision to return to Egypt. “Let us make a captain,” they cried, “and let us return into Egypt.” (Numbers 14:4, emphasis supplied). The Lord’s Response To Israel’s Failure To Enter Canaan “After the number of the days in which ye searched the land, even forty days, each day for a year, shall ye bear your iniquities, even forty years,” the Lord said, “and ye shall know my breach of promise.” (Numbers 14:34, emphasis supplied). The King James marginal reading states, “and ye shall know the altering of my purpose.” The Revised Standard states, “Ye shall know my displeasure.” The New International Version states, “You will . . . know what it is like to have me against you.” God fulfilled His promise to His people. They went into the promised land, but God’s plan for His people was altered. Those who had come out of Egypt wandered forty years and perished in the wilderness. Only two who had come out of Egypt, Joshua and Caleb entered the promised land. Is there a lesson in that fact for us today? How many who came out of the great disappointment of 1844 were translated into the heavenly Canaan? God’s first plan was that Moses was to lead the children of Israel into the promised land at Kadesh-barnea. God’s plan was altered because the people “murmured” and refused to believe. In God’s altered plan Joshua led the people into the promised land forty years later – not at Kadesh-barnea but at Jericho! (Joshua 4:19). Is it possible that God has also altered His plan for His remnant people? Yes. Modern Israel, the Seventh-day Adventist Church, came to a modern-day Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -399- Kadesh-barnea at the 1888 General Conference session. Modern Israel also “murmured” against the “most precious message” that they should go in and possess the heavenly Canaan. But modern Israel also turned back. However, unlike ancient Israel, modern Israel has done worse. Modern Israel did not turn back toward Egypt – but all the way back toward Spiritual Babylon! “I saw that many who profess to believe the truth for these last days think it strange that the children of Israel murmured as they journeyed; that after the wonderful dealings of God with them, they should be so ungrateful as to forget what He had done for them,” Ellen White wrote. “Said the angel: ‘Ye have done worse than they.’” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 1, page 129, emphasis supplied). Notice it was the angel that said, “Ye have done worse than they.” Again, the Scriptures state, “Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.” (1 Corinthians 10:11). Proper Method To Study Past and Future Events Before we begin our study of “Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea” it will be necessary to review the proper method of study. Is there inspired instruction on how we should study the Bible and Spirit of Prophecy? “For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line,” Isaiah replies, “here a little, and there a little.” (Isaiah 28:9, 10). The very same principle of “line upon line” is used to study the Testimonies. Did the Testimonies not come from the same source as Scripture? Was it not the same Holy Spirit who inspired the writings of Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel, John the Revelator, and all of God’s prophets, who also inspired the writings of Ellen White? We must study the Spirit of Prophecy as we do the scripture, “Precept upon precept, line upon line, here a little and there a little.” The Key To Understanding the Testimonies “The testimonies themselves will be the key that will explain the messages given,” Ellen White wrote, “as scripture is explained by scripture.” (Selected Messages, Bk. 1, page. 42, emphasis supplied). The Rich Man and Lazarus – An Illustration Of Line Upon Line A good Illustration of this method of study would be the story of “the rich man and Lazarus.” (Luke 16:20, 21). If we stand only on this parable as a basis for the Bible teaching on the state of man in death, we would be led into grave error. But when we compare all Scripture on the state of man in death, line upon line, precept upon precept, we are able to see clearly the truth. “For the living know that they shall die,” Solomon wrote, “but the dead know not any thing. . . .” (Ecclesiastes 9:5a, emphasis supplied) Two Important Concepts Two important principles must be understood when studying the Testimonies. (1) Nothing is cast aside, and (2), time and place must be considered. “Regarding the testimonies, nothing is ignored; nothing is cast aside; but time and place must be considered. . . ,” Ellen White instructed. “Every jot and tittle is essential and must appear at an opportune time.” (ibid., 1SM, p. 57, emphasis supplied). “Time and place should be considered backwards and forwards,” Elder William Grotheer said. “As you look back on the testimonies as to what has been said, you must take into consideration the time and Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -400- place in which its said. And testimonies that are prophetic you must look forward and be able to place them in the time and place of their setting.” (William H. Grotheer, Sermon, “The Altering Of the Divine Purpose,”Adventist Laymen’s Foundation, Ozone, Arkansas). The Persian Empire – An Illustration Of Time and Place In Prophecy A person living in the time of the Persian Empire, the second world empire, the time depicted by the prophet Daniel as the arms of silver on the image of Daniel 2, verse 39, and the bear with three ribs in its mouth, Daniel 7:5, would not understand the prophecy of Daniel 8. In this prophecy the Grecian Empire, depicted by the he-goat and the leopard beast, would follow the Persian Empire. Time and place would not be understood, because the time had not yet come to pass. “Thus we are told in the study of the Spirit of Prophecy that ‘time and place’ are vital, not only as you look into the past, as to when these things were said and the circumstances, but as you go into the future,” William Grotheer stated. “Those prophetic utterances must also come in time and place.” (ibid., William H. Grotheer, Sermon, “The Altering Of the Divine Purpose,” Adventist Laymen’s Foundation). God’s Original End-Time Plan For the Seventh-day Adventist Church 1844-1900 – Time Almost Ended It was God’s original plan that His remnant people would be ready for translation and that Jesus should return before the beginning of the 20th century. As far back as 1878 Ellen White began to state that Jesus was about to return – that the end of all things was at hand. These testimonies of the imminent return of Jesus continued throughout the 1880's. 1878 Statement That Time Was Very Short “In the late vision given me at Battle Creek during our general camp meeting, I was shown our danger, as a people, of becoming assimilated to the world rather than to the image of Christ,” Ellen White warned.. “We are now upon the very borders of the eternal world. . ..” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 4, page 306, emphasis supplied). 1881 Statements That Time Was Very Short “I would, at this time, sound the note of warning to those who shall assemble at our camp meeting,” Ellen White again warned. “The end of all things is at hand.” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 5, page 16, emphasis supplied). “Brethren and sisters, I have been shown that we are standing upon the threshold of the eternal world,” Ellen White stated further in 1881. (ibid., 5T, p. 18, emphasis supplied). 1885 Statement That Time Was Very Short “We are standing, as it were, on the borders of the eternal world.” (ibid., 5T, p. 382, emphasis supplied). 1886 Statement That Time Was Very Short “We are standing upon the very verge of the eternal world. . ..” (ibid., 5T, p. 460, emphasis supplied). If you, dear reader, were a Seventh-day Adventist living during the 1880's when these testimonies came from the pen of inspiration you, no doubt, would believe that the return of Jesus was imminent and that the end of all things was at hand. No other conclusion could be derived from these statements. “From these series of testimonies given in the 1880's there is no other conclusion,” Elder Grotheer said. “Time after time Ellen White stated, ‘I’ve been shown . . . I’ve been shown . . . I’ve been shown. . . the Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -401- end of all things is at hand . . . we are standing upon the very borders . . . the threshold . . . the very verge of the eternal world.’” (ibid., William H. Grotheer, Sermon, “The Altering Of the Divine Purpose”). “Eternity stretches before us,”Ellen White wrote in 1886. “The curtain is about to be lifted.” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 5, page 464, emphasis supplied). The third angel’s message has been going to all the world for over one hundred and eleven years since these “imminent return” testimonies were written. Why has there been a delay in the Lord’s coming? How do we explain these testimonies, prophecies that did not come to pass? Was Ellen White a false prophet? No, she was not a false prophet. We just do not understand the Bible and the Spirit of Prophecy as we should. We simply do not understand that God alters His plans according to the response of His people to present truth! Misunderstanding the “How” Of God’s Purpose “Ye shall know the altering of my purpose,” the Lord said to Moses and the children of Israel. (Numbers 14:34, margin). How could pioneer Adventists, who had access to a living prophet, and we today who have access to her writings, misunderstand the end-time purpose of God? The answer is simple. Throughout history God’s people have always misunderstood the “how” prophecy would be fulfilled. (1) The Church at the time of Christ’s first advent looked for the Messiah to come as a King to free them from Roman domination. Were they wrong? Yes! Jesus came as a servant, not as a King, born in a barn, not to leaders of the Church, raised in Nazareth, an undesirable part of the country. “Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth?” Nathanael asked, and Philip replied, “Come and see.” (John 1:46). “And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth,” Matthew wrote, “that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, ‘He shall be called a Nazarene.’” (Matthew 2:23, emphasis supplied). Much was written in Scripture about “how” the Messiah would come, yet the Church leadership failed to understand. They wanted Jesus to be their earthly King, and so they looked for an earthly King. From their study of the prophecies the wise men and the shepherds knew “how” the Messiah would really come. The Church leadership did not. Even Satan and his demons knew that Jesus would come from Nazareth. When Jesus cast out the demon he said, “Let us alone; what have we to do with thee, thou Jesus of Nazareth . . . I know thee who thou art, the Holy One of God.” (Mark 1:24, emphasis supplied). (2) The apostle Paul warned that before Jesus returned the second time, Antichrist would appear within the Church. He would sit in the temple of God, “shewing himself that he is God.” (2 Thessalonians 2:4). Yet the coming of Antichrist is still looked for in the future by most Christians today! They were and still are, deceived by the “how” the prophecy would be fulfilled. (3) William Miller and the early Advent people believed the earth was the sanctuary to be cleansed at the end of the 2, 300 year prophecy of Daniel 8:14. To them this meant that Jesus would return on October 22, 1844. They were mistaken by “how” the prophecy would be fulfilled. After further study of Scripture they understood clearly that the earth was not the sanctuary to be cleansed, but that it was the heavenly sanctuary that was to be cleansed at the end of the 2,300 years. They were correct about the “time” – but they were mistaken about the “event!” Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -402- Is it possible that Adventists in the past have been mistaken by “how” prophecy would be fulfilled? Is it possible that we today may still be mistaken by our perception of “how” all things will end? Yes, it is possible. We must study the Bible and Spirit of Prophecy as never before, using the method of line upon line, precept upon precept, casting nothing aside, and taking time and place into consideration. Also in our study we should always remember “how the Lord has led us, and His teaching, in our past history.” (Life Sketches, page 196). The Sunday Law – A Sign To Leave the Large Cities? In God’s first plan a national Sunday Law “was” the sign that His people were to leave the large cities for smaller cities, preparing to leave the smaller ones for secluded places in the mountains. Is this sign of the times still wise counsel for today? It is no time now for God’s people to be fixing their affections or laying up their treasure in the world. The time is not far distant, when, like the early disciples, we shall be forced to seek a refuge in desolate and solitary places. As the siege of Jerusalem by the Roman armies was the signal for flight to the Judean Christians, so the assumption of power on the part of our nation in the decree enforcing the papal sabbath will be a warning to us. It will then be time to leave the large cities, preparatory to leaving the smaller ones for retired homes in secluded places among the mountains. ibid., Ellen G. White, Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 5, pages 464, 465. (emphasis supplied). In the book Maranatha, under the title, “The Sign To Leave Large Cities,” page 188, this statement is quoted. Again in the book Last Day Events, under the title, “The Signal for Flight From the Cities,” page 121, this statement is quoted. In the book Country Living, under the title, “Emergency Flight in Closing Conflict,” page 32, this statement is again quoted word for word. It is again quoted in the book Christian Service, page 161. What do these books listed have in common? They are all compilations! They were not written by Ellen White in context, but were compiled by the Ellen G. White Estate in modern times. But why would the leadership of the Church wish to hold on to the first counsel that the Sunday Law will be the sign or signal to leave the large cities? The answer is simple. The leadership of the Church is content to remain in the large cities of the world. The original statement on the Sunday Law as a sign to leave the large cities appeared first in Testimonies for the Church, Volume 5, pages 464, 465. This testimony was written in 1886. We must take time and place into consideration and note later testimonies on this point. Why? Because God’s end-time plan is changed and later testimonies have revealed this change. Notice that in God’s first plan the Sunday Law was to be a sign for His people to “leave the large cities, preparatory to leaving the smaller ones for retired homes in secluded places among the mountains.” Shortly after the turn of the century God’s message was, “Do not wait for a national Sunday Law to be passed and enforced – get out of the cities now.” “The world over cities are becoming hotbeds of vice,” Ellen White warned in 1905. (Ministry of Healing, page 363). “Out of the cities, out of the cities, this is the message the Lord has been giving me.” (Life Sketches, page 409). Obviously God had altered His plan on the sign to leave the large cities. “Out of the cities now,” is the counsel. Notice that the testimony does not mention a Sunday Law as a sign to leave the large cities. Has the leadership of modern Israel complied with this counsel? No. More and more Seventh-day Adventist institutions are established, not only in large cities, but in the heart of America’s largest cities! Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -403- “God has sent warning after warning that our schools and publishing houses and sanitariums are to be established out of the city, in places where the youth may be taught most effectively what is truth,” Ellen White wrote. “Let no one attempt to use the Testimonies to vindicate the establishment of large business interests in the cities. Do not make of no effect the light that has been given upon this subject.” (The Publishing Ministry, page 185, emphasis supplied). 1888 - Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea “The Lord in His great mercy sent a most precious message to His people through Elders Waggoner and Jones,” Ellen White wrote. “This message was to bring more prominently before the world the uplifted Saviour, the sacrifice for the sins of the whole world. (Testimonies to Ministers, pages. 91, 92). (1) What was this most precious message? “It presented justification through faith in the Surety; it invited the people to receive the righteousness of Christ,” Ellen White stated, “which is made manifest in obedience to all the commandments of God.” (2) Why did Seventh-day Adventists need this most precious message? “Many had lost sight of Jesus,” Ellen White replied. “They needed to have their eyes directed to His divine person, His merits, and His changeless love for the human family. All power is given into His hands, that He may dispense rich gifts unto men, imparting the priceless gift of His own righteousness to the helpless human agent.” (ibid., TM, p. 92, emphasis supplied). (3) How had Seventh-day Adventists lost sight of Jesus? “Now, it has been Satan's determined purpose to eclipse the view of Jesus and lead men to look to man, and trust to man, and be educated to expect help from man,” Ellen White wrote. “For years the church has been looking to man and expecting much from man, but not looking to Jesus, in whom our hopes of eternal life are centered. (4) How did God respond to the SDA Church looking to man? “Therefore [for this reason] God gave to His servants a testimony that presented the truth as it is in Jesus,” Ellen White declared, “which is the third angel's message, in clear, distinct lines.” (ibid., TM, p. 93, emphasis supplied). A Two-Fold Message The 1888 message was two fold. (1) The doctrinal message of righteousness by faith, which concerned the individual, and (2), the message of religious liberty, which concerned the Church. This second portion of the message was to lead Seventh-day Adventists to let Christ rule the Church rather than looking to the ecclesiastical authority of man to rule the Church. The message was not to look to human organization, but to “the truth as it is in Jesus.” E. J. Waggoner presented the “righteousness by faith” message to overcome sin and be ready for translation. A. T. Jones presented the message of “religious liberty,” not only in the world, but religious liberty in the Church, giving the individual the freedom to practice righteousness by faith. Waggoner’s 1888 message was published in 1890 in a book titled, “Christ and His Righteousness,” currently published by Pacific Press and is available at any Adventist Book Center. Jones’ 1888 message was published in 1889 in a book titled, Civil Government and Religion. The book was from a series of articles published in the American Sentinel, Atlanta, Georgia. The American Sentinel was the forerunner of Religious Liberty magazine. The book Civil Government and Religion can be purchased Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -404- from LMN Publishing International, Inc., HC04, Box 94C, St. Maries, Idaho, 83861: also, Leaves-Of- Autumn-Books, P. O. Box 440, Payson, Arizona, 85541. Issues Facing the Nation In 1888 On May 21, 1888, a bill, written by Senator Blair, was introduced in Congress titled, “The National Sunday Rest Bill of 1888.” This action took place just five months prior to the General Conference session of October, 1888. The bill stated in part, “A Bill to secure to the people the enjoyment of the first day of the week, commonly known as the Lord’s Day, as a day of rest and to promote its observance as a day of worship.” This bill stated further that, “Being enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled:- That no person, or corporation, or the agent service or employees of any person or corporation, shall perform, or authorize to be performed, a secular work, labor, or business, to the disturbance to others; works of necessity, mercy and humanity accepted; nor shall any person engage in any play, game, or amusement, or recreation, to the disturbance of others, on the first day of the week, commonly known as the Lord’s Day.” Ellen White had stated in 1885, “To secure popularity and patronage, legislators will yield to the demand for a Sunday law.” (ibid., 5T, p. 451, emphasis supplied). This prophecy came to pass just three years later on May 21, 1888 when the Sunday Law bill was introduced to Congress. This Sunday Law bill was introduced in the Congress of the United States over 109 years ago! What does this mean as to the signs of final events? What about the counsel that “the decree enforcing the papal sabbath will be a warning to us. It will then be time to leave the large cities, preparatory to leaving the smaller ones for retired homes in secluded places among the mountains.” (ibid., 5T, pp. 464, 465, emphasis supplied). A. T. Jones, then head of Religious Liberty for the General Conference, appeared before the Congressional Committee and defended the principles of separation of Church and State. The bill never passed. When Jones came to the General Conference session of 1888 he reported on these issues. After this experience, A. T. Jones wrote the book titled, Civil Government and Religion. (See above). In the Preface to this book, over the initials, A. T. J., February 13, 1889, it is stated, “This little work is the outgrowth of several lectures upon the relationship between religion and civil power, delivered in Minneapolis, Minnesota in October, 1888.” This little book, then, was the 1888 message given by A. T. Jones in regard to religious liberty. Again, this Sunday Law bill did not pass in 1888. The actual Sunday Law that did pass was a “rider” to an appropriations bill that proposed the Sunday closing of the Chicago Exposition of 1892. This Chicago World’s Fair was celebrating the four hundredth anniversary of the discovery of America in 1492. The “rider” to the appropriations bill stated in part, “Under the condition that the said Exposition shall not be open to the public on the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday.” This bill passed and was signed by President Harrison on August 5, 1892. Notice that the wording was changed. The wording in the first bill that did not pass was “the first day of the week, commonly called the Lord’s Day.” The bill that passed stated “commonly called Sunday.” Although this was not an oppressive one, the Sunday closing law was now on the record books. This Sunday closing law was signed August 5, 1892. Three months later, November 22, 1892, Ellen White wrote, “Let everyone who claims to believe that the Lord is soon coming search the Scriptures as never before.” (Review and Herald, November 22, 1892). 1888 – The Beginning Of the Latter Rain Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -405- “This is the message that God commanded to be given to the world,” Ellen White stated about the 1888 message. “It is the third angel's message, which is to be proclaimed with a loud voice, and attended with the outpouring of His Spirit in a large measure.” (ibid., TM, p. 92, emphasis supplied). “The time of test is just upon us,” Ellen White wrote in 1892, “for the loud cry of the third angel has already begun.” R&H, 11/22/92. Observe that in 1892 Ellen White stated that, “The time of test is just upon us,” and that the Loud Cry had begun with the 1888 message of righteousness by faith. Note carefully the complete testimony in context: Let every one who claims to believe that the Lord is soon coming, search the Scriptures as never before; for Satan is determined to try every device possible to keep souls in darkness, and blind the mind to the perils of the times in which we are living. Let every believer take up his Bible with earnest prayer, that he may be enlightened by the holy Spirit as to what is truth, that he may know more of God and of Jesus Christ whom he has sent. Search for the truth as for hidden treasures, and disappoint the enemy. The time of test is just upon us, for the loud cry of the third angel has already begun in the revelation of the righteousness of Christ, the sin-pardoning Redeemer. This is the beginning of the light of the angel whose glory shall fill the whole earth. For it is the work of every one to whom the message of warning has come, to lift up Jesus, to present him to the world as revealed in types, as shadowed in symbols, as manifested in the revelations of the prophets, as unveiled in the lessons given to his disciples and in the wonderful miracles wrought for the sons of men. Search the Scriptures; for they are they that testify of him. ibid., Ellen G. White, Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, November 22, 1892. (emphasis supplied). “The time of test is just upon us” was caused by the national Sunday Law passed in 1892. What other conclusion could there be? In 1892 the end of all things had come. The test of a Sunday Law was before them. The loud cry had begun. 1889-1905 – Sabbath/Sunday Statements By Roman Catholics “The message will be carried . . . not so much by argument” “The message will be carried, as was the midnight cry of 1844, not so much by argument as by the deep conviction of the Spirit of God,” Ellen White wrote. “The arguments have been presented.” (“The Loud Cry,” The Spirit of Prophecy, Vol. 4, page 430 (1888), emphasis supplied). This statement was in the old edition of The Great Controversy, first published in 1884. The arguments were presented at the very time, 1892, that Ellen White stated the loud cry had already begun. In 1888 the national Sunday Rest bill was introduced. In 1892, August 5, the first national Sunday closing law was enacted by Congress. Starting in 1889, and continuing until 1905, statements on the change of the Sabbath, from the seventh to the first day of the week, began to appear by Roman Catholic leaders. As you note the dates of the following Sunday statements penned by Roman Catholic leaders, keep in mind the statements by Ellen White that, ”The time of test is just upon us,” and also that, “the loud cry of the third angel has already begun.” We must also keep in mind that,.”The message will be carried . . . not so much by argument . . . ,” because, “The arguments have been presented.” 1889 – First Roman Catholic Statement “The Bible says:’Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy,’” Father T. Enright wrote, “but the Catholic Church says: ‘No, keep the first day of the week,’ and all the world bows in obedience.” (T. Enright, of the Redemptorist Fathers, Industrial American, January 19, 1889, published in Harlan, Iowa, emphasis supplied). Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -406- Notice that this statement was made only four months after the General Conference of October, 1888. Ellen White stated that the message given at that time was the beginning of the loud cry. Keeping in mind the statement by T. Enright that, “all the world bows in obedience” to the Roman Catholic Church, note the following Scripture: “And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.” John prophesied. “And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.” (Revelation 13:3, 8, emphasis supplied). How much argument would you have to give on this point at the time the statement was made by T. Enright? None. The arguments had already been made. 1893 – Second Roman Catholic Statement “The Catholic Church for over one thousand years before the existence of a Protestant, by the virtue of her divine mission,” James Cardinal Gibbons wrote, “changed the day from Saturday to Sunday.” (Pamphlet, The Christian Sabbath, Baltimore, Maryland; published by The Catholic Mirror, 1893, emphasis supplied). Another point to keep in mind was the unfavorable position held by the Roman Catholic Church among Protestants during the past century. Indeed, even the Seventh-day Adventist leadership, through their attorneys in a Supreme Court brief, stated, “that attitude on the [SDA] Church’s part was nothing more than a manifestation of widespread anti-popery among conservative Protestant denominations in the early part of this century and the latter part of the last.” (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission vs Pacific Press Publishing Association, Civ. No. 74-2025 CBR., Footnote #2,.page 41, emphasis supplied). Because of the anti-Catholic atmosphere during the 1880's and 1890's it would have been easy to present the truth of the seventh day Sabbath. 1893 – Baptist Statement In 1893, Dr. E. T. Hiscox, a Baptist clergyman and author of the Baptist Manual, in a paper read before a ministers meeting in Saratoga, New York, stated: Of course I quite well know that Sunday did come at a use in early Christian history as a religious day, as we learn from the Christian Fathers and other sources, but what a pity that it comes branded with the mark of Paganism, christened with the name of the sun god, then adopted and sanctioned by the Papal apostasy, and bequeathed as a sacred legacy of Protestantism and the Christian world. Dr. E. T. Hiscox, Paper, read before a ministers meeting in Saratoga, New York, 1893. Not one Seventh-day Adventist could have stated the change of the Sabbath more plainly than did the Baptist E. T. Hiscox. This statement has been a powerful tool used by Adventist evangelism over the years to prove the Protestant position on the change of the Sabbath. But when was the statement made? 1893, during the time of the beginning of the loud cry. 1894 – Third Roman Catholic Statement The Church took the Pagan philosophy and made it the buckler of faith against the heathen. She took the Roman Pantheon, temple of all the gods, and made it sacred to all the martyrs, and so it stands to this day. She took the Pagan Sunday and made it the Christian Sunday. The sun was the foremost god of heathendom, hence the Church in these countries would seem to have said, “Keep that old Pagan name, it shall remain consecrated, sanctified.” Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -407- And thus the Pagan Sunday, dedicated to Balder [the white god of the Scandinavians], became the Christian Sunday, sacred to Jesus. The Catholic World, March, 1894. 1895 – Fourth Roman Catholic Statement In 1895 J. F. Snyder wrote to Cardinal Gibbons, asking questions about the role of the Roman Catholic Church in the change of the Sabbath. A reply was sent through Cardinal Gibbons’ Chancellor. In his reply the Chancellor stated: Of course the Catholic Church claims the change was her act. It could not have been otherwise as none in those days would have dreamed of doing anything of matters spiritual and ecclesiastical without her. And the act is a mark of her ecclesiastical power and authority in religious matters. Letter, from the Chancellor of James Cardinal Gibbons to J. F. Snyder, Bloomington, Illinois, November 11, 1895. (emphasis supplied). Here is plainly stated the “mark of the beast.” The arguments on the change of the Sabbath were made and presented by other than Seventh-day Adventists during this time period. All that was needed for the people of God, under the power of the latter rain, was to present the message of righteousness by faith in a loud cry to the world. 1897 – Fifth Roman Catholic Statement In 1897 John Milner, a Roman Catholic Divine, wrote a letter to James Brown, a member of a Protestant Religious Society. After reviewing the history of the Sabbath from Creation to the life of Christ, Milner drew the following conclusion in his letter: “Yet with all this weight of Scripture authority for keeping the Sabbath or seventh day holy, Protestants, of all denominations, make this a profane day and transfer the obligation of it to the first day of the week, or the Sunday,” Milner concluded. “Now what authority have they for doing this? None at all, but the unwritten word or tradition of the Catholic Church.” (Letter #11, quoted in The End of Religious Controversy, New York, P. J. Kenedy, 1897, page 89, emphasis his). 1899-1905 – Three Continuous Offers Of $1, 000 (1) I hereby offer $1, 000 to anyone who can prove to me, from the Bible alone, that I am bound, under pain of grievous sin, to keep Sunday holy. T. Enright, CssR, Kansas City, MO., June 16, 1899. (2) I still offer $1, 000 to anyone who can prove to me, from the Bible alone, that I am bound, under pain of grievous sin, to keep Sunday holy. We keep Sunday in obedience to the law of the Catholic Church. The Church made this law long after the Bible was written; hence the law is not in the Bible. The Catholic church abolished not only the Sabbath, but all the other Jewish festivals T. Enright, Letter, dated at Detroit, MI, April 26, 1902. (3) I have offered and still offer $1, 000 to anyone who can prove to me, from the Bible alone, that I am bound, under pain of grievous sin, to keep Sunday holy. It was the Catholic Church which made the law obliging us to keep Sunday holy. The Church made this law long after the Bible was written; hence said law is not in the Bible. Christ our Lord empowered His church to make laws binding on conscious. T. Enright, Letter, dated at St. Louis, MO, June, 1905. These statements by Protestants and the leaders of the Roman Catholic Church were used by evangelists during the 1940's and 1950's, the heyday of Seventh-day Adventist evangelism. Again, these statements were made during the time period 1889 through 1905. This was not a mere coincidence. God was preparing the way for the finishing of the work. Had He not said through Ellen White, “we are standing Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -408- upon the threshold of the eternal world?” (5T, p. 18). God sent a special message to the Seventh-day Adventist Church. The Loud Cry had begun. The Sunday Law was in place. The arguments on Sabbath and Sunday had been presented. Everything was in place for the finishing of the work. The time was right – the hour had struck! What happened? We are still here at the turn of still another century? The Crisis Of 1901 and 1903 Within the SDA Church In the crisis of 1901 and 1903 the issue was organization, more specifically, the office of the President of the General Conference. In her opening address at the 1901 General Conference session, Ellen White called for a reorganization, based upon a different principle. A new constitution was adopted in 1901. (See, General Conference Bulletin, Vol. IV, First Quarter, April 22, 1901. Extra, No. 17, page 378). In this new constitution the office of the President of the General Conference was abolished and in its place a General Conference “chairman,” a new chairman to be elected each year, was established. In 1903 the 1901 Constitution was abolished and the principles of Romanism prior to the 1901 Constitution were reestablished. Arthur G. Daniells, the first chairman of the General Conference Committee elected in 1901 considered himself to be the President, rather than a mere “chairman.” At the 1903 General Conference session Daniells presented still another Constitution reinstating the office of President of the General Conference Although this 1903 subversive Constitution was opposed by a minority committee, the Constitution was passed and adapted. The Minority Committee Report was signed by three men, E. J. Waggoner, Dr. David Paulson, and Percy T. Magan. A. T. Jones was also on the Minority committee. “The motion for the Minority position was put, and was lost!.” (GCB, 1903, No.10, p. 147, emphasis supplied). Arthur G. Daniells retained the Presidency of the General Conference for over twenty years. Returning To the Track Of Romanism In his statement on the position of the minority committee, Percy T. Magan, noted pioneer Adventist educator, made the following observations: “The minority report expresses in a word the feelings which actuated the minority in making the report, because we believe that the constitution proposed by the majority of the committee appears to us to be so subversive of the principles of organization given to us at the General Conferences of 1897 and 1901,” Magan stated. “Those principles were given to us by the Spirit of God. In my judgment, and in the judgment of the minority of the committee, this constitution is absolutely subversive of those principles.” (ibid., GCB, 1903, No.10, p. 150, emphasis supplied). “The General Conference is itself becoming corrupted with wrong sentiments and principles,” Ellen White wrote in 1895. “They are following in the track of Romanism.” (Testimonies to Ministers, pages 359, 362, (1895), emphasis supplied). Objection To Reestablishing One Man At the Head Of the Work “Further,” Magan emphasized, “this whole house must recognize this, before we are through with this discussion, that the proposed new constitution, whatever improvements may be claimed for it, whatever advantages it may be stated that it contains, that, in principle, as far as the head of the work is concerned, it goes back precisely where we were before the reformatory steps of two years ago.” (ibid., GCB, 1903, No.10, p. 150, emphasis supplied). Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -409- 1903 – An Image Of the Papacy In the SDA Church Then in his statement on the position of the minority committee Percy T. Magan made the following startling observation: “The principles which are to be brought in through this proposed constitution, and in the way in which they are brought in,” Magan stated, “are the same principles, and introduced in precisely the same way, as they were hundreds of years ago when the Papacy was made.” (ibid., GCB, 1903, No.10, p. 150, emphasis supplied). One hundred and eight delegates were present. Eighty-five voted for the new subversive Constitution, “carrying the action by a majority of four.” (Arthur L. White, EGW, The Early Elmshaven Years, page 257). At the moment the delegates voted the subversive “new” Constitution, the corporate Seventh-day Adventist Church began to travel down the track toward Romanism. Within the Seventh-day Adventist Church, an image of the Papacy was voted in 1903! God’s Altered Plan 1901-1903 – Altered Testimonies About the Church and the End After the new subversive 1903 Constitution was voted, reverting the policies of the Church back “in the track of Romanism,” a key testimony came from the pen of inspiration just ten days later. In this testimony the Seventh-day Adventist Church was now to be judged in the balances of the heavenly sanctuary. “In the balances of the sanctuary the Seventh-day Adventist church is to be weighed,” Ellen White wrote. “She will be judged by the privileges and advantages that she has had.” (“Shall We Be Found Wanting,” April 21, 1903, Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 8, page 247, emphasis supplied). If the Seventh-day Adventist Church is going through, why does she have to face a judgement? How and by what criteria will the Church be Judged? “If her spiritual experience does not correspond to the advantages that Christ, at infinite cost, has bestowed on her, if the blessings conferred have not qualified her to do the work entrusted to her,” Ellen White warned, “on her will be pronounced the sentence: ‘Found wanting.’ By the light bestowed, the opportunities given, will she be judged.” (ibid., 8T, p. 247, emphasis supplied). 1901 – Altered Testimony – “Many More Years” After the turn of the century key testimonies began to appear from the pen of inspiration. In 1901, rather than stating that we were at the very end of time, the pen of inspiration stated that, “We may have to remain here in this world . . . many more years.” Not only that, but “as did the children of Israel.” Ellen White even told us why we would have to remain many more years – “because of insubordination.” “We may have to remain here in this world because of insubordination many more years as did the children of Israel,” Ellen White wrote in 1901, “but for Christ’s sake, His people should not add sin to sin by charging God with the consequence of their own wrong course of action.” (Letter to Percy T. Magan, December 7, 1901; Manuscript Release, no. 184, 1901). God has altered His end-time plan for the finishing of the work because the Church rejected the loud cry and the latter rain in the 1888 message, and because an image to the Papacy was established in the Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -410- Church at the turn of the century. In 1901, in a letter addressed to Percy T. Magan, Ellen White penned the following startling statement: White Estate Admits God’s Plan Has Been Altered “Obviously, she [Ellen White] believed that the end of the world was imminent,” the White Estate compilers noted. “But Christ’s return has been delayed. In 1901 Ellen White wrote, ‘We may have to remain here in this world because of insubordination many more years.’” (Compiler’s Note, Ellen G. White Estate, “Marriage,” Testimonies on Sexual Behavior, Adultery, and Divorce, page 13, emphasis supplied). Altered Testimonies On the Sunday Law As A Sign To Leave Large Cities Before the turn of the century the testimonies to leave the large cities was linked to a Sunday law. In 1902 Ellen White wrote, “On these cities God’s judgements will fall.” (Letter #58, 1902). In 1905 Ellen White wrote, “The world over cities are becoming hotbeds of vice.” (Ministry of Healing, page 363, 1905). In 1906 Ellen White pleaded, “Out of the cities, out of the cities, this is the message the Lord has been giving me.” (Life Sketches, page 409). Notice that she does not mention a Sunday Law. She gives other reasons for moving from the cities, but we are no longer to look for a Sunday Law as a sign to get out of the cities. In 1907 Ellen White warned, “Our cities are increasing in wickedness, and it is becoming more and more evident that those who remain in them unnecessarily, do so at the peril of their souls’ salvation.” (Manuscript #115, 1907). Again, nothing is said about the Sunday Law. “Get out! Get out, because of the wickedness,” is the counsel. Altered Testimonies On the Location Of God’s People Before the turn of the century, inspiration stated that the majority of God’s people were still in the Churches of Babylon, outside the Seventh-day Adventist Church. In God’s altered plan the majority of His people are in the remnant Church. “Notwithstanding the spiritual darkness, and alienation from God, that exist in the churches which constitute Babylon,” Ellen White wrote in 1888, “the great body of Christ’s true followers are still to be found in their communion.” (The Great Controversy, 1888 Edition, page 390, emphasis supplied). This statement was written in 1888. It is also in the 1911 edition of The Great Controversy, page 390. We can still read the statement today, but does it still apply today? God’s Altered Plan For the Closing Of the Work Because of the rejection of the loud cry and latter rain, God has altered His plan for the Church. Three weeks after Ellen White had written that the loud cry had already begun she was given a new testimony on the future of the Church and the message. After the truth has been proclaimed as a witness to all nations, every conceivable power of evil will be set in operation, and minds will be confused by many voices crying, “Lo, here is Christ, Lo, he is there. This is the truth, I have the message from God, he has sent me with great light.” Then there will be a removing of the landmarks, and an attempt to tear down the pillars of our faith. A more decided effort will be made to exalt the false Sabbath, and to cast contempt upon God himself by supplanting the day he has blessed and sanctified. This false Sabbath is to be enforced by an oppressive law. Satan and his angels are wide-awake, and intensely active, working with energy and perseverance through human instrumentalities to bring about his purpose of obliterating from the minds of men the Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -411- knowledge of God. But while Satan works with his lying wonders, the time will be fulfilled foretold in the Revelation, and the mighty angel that shall lighten the earth with his glory, will proclaim the fall of Babylon, and call upon God’s people to forsake her. Ellen G. White, Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, December 13, 1892. (emphasis supplied). “After the truth has been proclaimed as a witness to all nations.” If the truth has been proclaimed as a witness to all the nations, then will the greater part of God’s children still be out there in Babylon? No. Is there an altered end-time plan? Yes. In the loud cry of the 1890's, which was rejected, the greater part of God’s people were still out there in Babylon. Because of “insubordination”of His people God’s altered plan is that we are to remain here “many more years.” Now when the loud cry comes again, one hundred years later, the majority of God’s people are no longer out there in Babylon – there will not be a great influx of people into God’s remnant Church. The Time Of the Marvelous Working Of Satan In the hour in which we live – when many voices around us are crying, “Lo, here is Christ, Lo, he is there. This is the truth, I have the message from God, he has sent me with great light” – in this time in which we live “there will be a removing of the landmarks, and an attempt to tear down the pillars of our faith.” We have witnessed this in the past forty years. This prophecy has been, and is being, fulfilled to the very letter. During this end-time in which we live, “Satan and his angels are wide-awake, and intensely active, working with energy and perseverance through human instrumentalities to bring about his purpose of obliterating from the minds of men the knowledge of God.” What is God’s plan for His true people during this time of the marvelous working of Satan? When the Lord Cry Comes Again “But while Satan works with his lying wonders,” Ellen White replies, “the time will be fulfilled foretold in the Revelation, and the mighty angel that shall lighten the earth with his glory, will proclaim the fall of Babylon, and call upon God’s people to forsake her.” (ibid., R&H, 12/13/92, emphasis supplied). In this our day, the news media of the world will be filled with the evidence of “the marvelous working of Satan” and his “lying wonders.” But we are told that “while Satan works with his lying wonders,” the loud cry will commence in “the mighty angel that shall lighten the earth with his glory.” In the 1890's God’s first plan was to call the majority of His people out of the fallen churches of Babylon into the Seventh-day Adventist Church. Now, one hundred years later, when the loud cry commences again, the message “will proclaim the fall of Babylon, and call upon God’s people to forsake her.” (ibid.). God will fulfill his covenant promise, but will it be fulfilled in the manner in which we first believed? “Ye shall know the altering of my purpose.” (Numbers 14:34). “Christians should be preparing for what is soon to break upon the world as an overwhelming surprise,” Ellen White warned, and this preparation they should make by diligently studying the Word of God and striving to conform their lives to its precepts.” (Prophets and Kings, page 626, 1914). “Confusion fills the world, and a great terror is soon to come upon human beings,” Ellen White warned. “The end is very near. We who know the truth should be preparing for what is soon to break upon the world as an overwhelming surprise.” (The Watchman, “Even at the Door,” December 1, 1909). If we do not see the lessons written in the history of the children of Israel and the history of the Advent movement, we are going to make some terrible mistakes. Again, God will fulfill His covenant promise, but we will not be going in at Kadesh-barnea. We will be crossing the Jordan at Jericho. It will not be Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -412- Moses that will lead the remnant into the promised land, but Jehoshua who leads His church across Jordan. [Note:- In the Strong’s Greek dictionary commentary on Hebrews 4:8, #2424, the word “Jesus” is stated to be “Jehoshua, the name of our Lord.” Also the King James marginal reading for the word “Jesus” in Hebrews 4:8 is “Joshua.” The NIV and RSV translate the word “Jesus” in Hebrews 4:8 as “Joshua.” The name “Jesus” and “Joshua” are interchangeable.] The Question Of Removing the Old Landmarks and Pillars Was there an attempt to remove the landmarks and pillars of Adventism in 1888? No. But there was accusation that this was being done in the 1888 message. The Landmarks Defined -- In Minneapolis God gave precious gems of truth to His people in new settings. This light from heaven by some was rejected with all the stubbornness the Jews manifested in rejecting Christ, and there was much talk about standing by the old landmarks. But there was evidence they knew not what the old landmarks were. There was evidence and there was reasoning from the word that commended itself to the conscience; but the minds of men were fixed, sealed against the entrance of light, because they had decided it was a dangerous error removing the “old landmarks” when it was not moving a peg of the old landmarks, but they had perverted ideas of what constituted the old landmarks. (CWE, p. 30). Notice that in 1888 there was no attempt to remove the old landmarks or pillars of Adventism. There was evidence that some of the leaders did not know what the landmarks and pillars of Adventism were. The old landmarks and pillars were not being removed in 1888, but what was the real condition that existed in 1888. Those who resisted the Spirit of God at Minneapolis were waiting for a chance to travel over the same ground again, because their spirit was the same. Afterward, when they had evidence heaped upon evidence, some were convicted; but those who were not softened and subdued by the Holy Spirit's working, put their own interpretation upon every manifestation of the grace of God, and they have lost much. They declared in their heart and soul and words that this manifestation of the Holy Spirit was fanaticism and delusion. . .. But all the universe of heaven witnessed the disgraceful treatment of Jesus Christ, represented by the Holy Spirit. Had Christ been before them, they would have treated him in a manner similar to that in which the Jews treated Christ. Ellen G. White, Special Testimonies for Ministers and Workers, Series A, No. 6, page 19. (emphasis supplied). This was our experience in 1888. Notice that if Jesus had been before them at Minneapolis “they would have treated him in a manner similar to that in which the Jews treated Christ.” This was our Kadeshbarnea. After that experience Ellen White stated, “We may have to remain here in this world because of insubordination many more years as did the children of Israel. . . . .” (Letter to Percy T. Magan, December 7, 1901). What is “insubordination?” It is rebellion. You will not obey the commands, you will not harken to it. What did Israel do at Kadesh-barnea? They murmured, they rebelled, they refused to go into and possess the promised land. Ellen White concluded the statement by adding that, “for Christ’s sake, His people should not add sin to sin by charging God with the consequence of their own wrong course of action.” The truth of this statement is in the fact that we are still here in the year of our Lord 1998. What did Israel do at Kadesh-barnea? They rebelled and had to stay forty long years in the wilderness. And when they went in, they did not go in at Kadesh-barnea, Moses did not take them in, Joshua took them in. They went in, but there was a change. The altering of the divine purpose. Removing the Landmarks Chapter 20 Modern Israel At Kadesh-Barnea -413- About the time in which we live Ellen White stated, “After the truth has been proclaimed as a witness to all nations . . . Then there will be a removing of the landmarks, and an attempt to tear down the pillars of our faith.” (ibid., R&H, 12/13/1892, emphasis supplied). Will this removing of the landmarks come from within or without? “We have far more to fear from within than from without,” Ellen White replies. “The hindrances to strength and success are far greater from the church itself than from the world.” (Selected Messages, Bk. 1, page 122, emphasis supplied). The end-time controversy will not be our relationship with the Church, but our relationship to Christ and His truth. If the landmarks and pillars of our faith have been removed, so that the pioneer Adventist truth cannot be recognized, is God going to bring millions of people out of the churches of Babylon into a corrupted Seventh-day Adventist Church? Is the loud cry going to be as we read the history of our people from 1888 to 1900? No. God has altered His end-time plan for modern Israel. Christ Would Have Come By 1901 “Had the purpose of God been carried out by His people in giving the [1888] message of mercy to the world,” Ellen White said in her talk at the 1901 General Conference, “Christ would have come to the earth, and the saints would ere this have received their welcome into the city of God.” (General Conference Bulletin, April 4, 1901; Repeated in Monthly Missionary Reading, April 9, 1908). And ye shall know the altering of my purpose”

Saturday, June 8, 2019

The Great Conspiracy Part # 18


THE TRIUMPH OF THE MESSAGE -- THE REMNANT CHURCH -- Corporate or Spiritual -- God has a church. . .it is the people who love God and keep His commandments The Upward Look, p. 315 According to the Bible, the Spirit of Prophecy, and pioneer Seventh-day Adventist literature, the true Church of Christ in the end of time, the remnant Church, is made up of two entities – the spiritual and the corporate. Unfortunately, (as history so vividly attests), as an organized Church becomes large in membership the truth is compromised, and ultimately cast aside. In the end of time the spiritual and the corporate are two separate Churches. This is why the Bible and the Spirit of Prophecy speak of a “remnant.” Truth cannot be mixed with error. Thus the apostle Paul says, “Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils.” (1 Corinthians 10:21). God has always had a true Church, though it has not always been a visible establishment, such as General and local Conference offices, church buildings, schools, hospitals and other visible structure. Church building structure would come later. Elected church offices of leadership would only be necessary as a vehicle or catalyst for coordinating the work of proclaiming the gospel to the world. It would never be mandatory for Church leadership to define doctrine, or to punish dissidents who would not adhere to a creed, Church Manual, or official Statement of Beliefs, defined and voted by leadership. Thus Ellen White wrote, “Vengeance will be executed against those who sit in the gate, deciding what the people should have, and what they should not have.” (The Paulson Collection of Ellen G. White Letters, page 55, emphasis supplied). It has never been the work of corporate Church leadership to compel unity among God’s people. The work of unifying the Church is the work of the Holy Spirit – through the truth that was inspired by that same Holy Spirit.. Only the truth can bring complete unity to the Church of Christ, be it corporate or spiritual. It is the will of God that union and harmony should exist among his people. Our Saviour prayed that his disciples might be one, as he is one with the Father. It should be our constant aim to reach this state of unity; but to do this we are not to sacrifice one principle of truth. It is through obedience to the truth that we A Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -375- are to be sanctified; for while Jesus prayed that his followers might be one, he prayed also, “Sanctify them through thy truth; thy word is truth.” We are exhorted to keep the unity of the spirit in the bonds of peace. This is the evidence of our discipleship. “By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another;” and conversely, our Saviour desired that his disciples might be one, that the world might know that the Father had sent him. What a thought! that the love and unity among Christians are presented as proof of our Saviour’s divine mission to the world. Ellen G. White, The Signs of the Times, May 12, 1881. (emphasis supplied). Notice again that, “It is through obedience to the truth that we are to be sanctified” and unified. “It should be our constant aim to reach this state of unity; but to do this we are not to sacrifice one principle of truth.” The Church Of Abel The Church of the first centuries consisted of the people who were the descendants of Abel. “The holy life of Abel testified against Satan’s claim that it is impossible for man to keep God’s law,” Ellen White wrote. (Patriarchs and Prophets, page 77). This first church believed and lived “the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.” (Revelation 14:12). “By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh.” (Hebrews 11:4). In the Church of Abel there were no church buildings, no visible structure. Worship was in the open with an altar and a living sacrifice which pointed to Jesus Christ “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.” (John 1:29b). The majority of earth’s population during this period did not believe the truth and followed after the descendants of Cain. Soon God’s people mingled with these unbelievers, which led to the destruction of the earth by water. (Genesis, chapter 6). Persecution Of the Saints Begins “The murder of Abel was the first example of the enmity that God had declared would exist between the serpent and the seed of the woman–between Satan and his subjects and Christ and His followers,” Ellen White wrote. “Through man’s sin, Satan had gained control of the human race, but Christ would enable them to cast off his yoke.” (ibid., PP, p. 77). Satan then began his warfare against this first Church, God’s little band of the faithful. The persecution of the true Church of Christ had begun and would continue and grow in intensity through the ages and would culminate in Satan’s final warfare against the “remnant” who “keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus,” and who “have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” (Rev. 12:17; 14:12). The Church Of Noah By the time of Noah, God’s Church, His true people dwindled to only eight members. But “Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord.” (Genesis 6:8). And further, “By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved [obeyed] with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith.” (Hebrews 11:7). There were no General and local Conference offices, church buildings, schools, hospitals or other visible structure in the Church of Noah. The only visible sign of a Church structure was a small Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -376- ship under construction. Again, in the days of Noah there were only eight Church members, and this “When men began to increase in number on the earth.” (Genesis 6:1a, NIV). Jesus said, “As were the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the Son of man.” (Matthew 24:37, RSV).-- The Church Of Abraham -- The Church of Abraham also comprised a small number of believersbelievers. By this time in history there were still no General and local Conference offices, church buildings, schools, hospitals or other visible structure. The Church of Abraham also believed in “The commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.” (Rev. 14:12). “Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.” (Genesis 26:5b). And further, “By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he went out, not knowing whither he went.” (Hebrews 11:8). Abraham was a Seventh-day Adventist because “he sojourned in the land of promise, as in a foreign land, living in tents with Isaac and Jacob, heirs with him of the same promise,” and “he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God.” (Hebrews 11:9, 10).-- The Church Of Moses -- The Church of Moses was the first large member church. This was the first Church to go into the wilderness. This Church in the wilderness had no General and local Conference offices, church buildings, schools or hospitals. Although housed in a tent, there was a visible sanctuary. Moses and his Church were Seventh-day Adventists because they were instructed to keep the Sabbath (Exodus 16), and they abstained from unclean meats (Leviticus 11), and they believed in the law of God. (Exodus 20). The Church of Moses was blessed above all the previous churches that had gone before because “the Lord went before them by day in a pillar of a cloud, to lead them the way; and by night in a pillar of fire, to give them light; to go by day and night.” (Exodus 13:21). The Lord gave to the Church of Moses the ten commandments written by the finger of God on two tables of stone, and the Ark of the Covenant. This Church was also blessed with the visible presence of God in the Shekinah light above the mercy seat of the Ark of the Covenant. “And there I will meet with thee, and I will commune with thee from above the mercy seat, from between the two Cherubims which are upon the ark of the testimony.” (Exodus 25:22a). Notwithstanding all of these blessings, all the members of the Church of Moses, with the exception of two, did not make it to the promised land, but perished in the wilderness. -- The Church Of the Kings -- After the wilderness experience, the children of Israel said unto Samuel, “make us a king to judge us like all the nations.” (1 Samuel 8:5b). Samuel did not agree with the policy of appointing an earthly king as the head of the Church. He sought the Lord in prayer for counsel on the matter. What was the Lord’s answer to Samuel’s prayer? “Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee,” a disappointed Lord replied to Samuel, “for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.” (1 Samuel 8:7b)--Notice that the reason the people wanted a visible earthly head of the church was that they wished to be “like all the nations.” We see the same spirit today in the Ecumenical movement within Adventism. Jesus allowed the children of Israel to have their earthly king, and He has also allowed the Seventh-day Adventist Church to have their earthly head, but in sorrow Jesus still says, “they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.” This Church of the kings did have General and local Conference offices, church buildings, schools and other visible structure. They recieved their wish. They had now become like the nations (churches) around them. Apostasy came into the Jewish church like a flood. -- The Jewish Church At the Time Of Christ -- By the time Jesus was born in Bethlehem the Church had developed into a total “hierarchal” structure. The Church was governed by the Sanhedrin, a General Conference. This Church did have schools, even schools of “higher learning,” hospitals, church buildings, and other visible structure. This Church had a glorious temple – but the Ark of the Covenant was missing, and the glory of the Lord had departed! (Luke 13:35). Regardless of this fact, the people worshiped the temple. The Church was their God. “The Jews worshiped the temple,” Ellen White wrote, “and were filled with greater indignation at anything spoken against that building than if it had been spoken against God.” (Early Writings, page 198). Although the Jewish Sanhedrin did not have the power of death, they did have the power to persecute anyone who opposed their ecclesiastical authority. Like the Papacy, the great apostasy soon to follow, the Sanhedrin sought out the power of the state to enforce their man-made dogmas upon the people. “Christ was to be tried formally before the Sanhedrin; but before Annas He was subjected to a preliminary trial,” Ellen White wrote. “Under the Roman rule the Sanhedrin could not execute the sentence of death. They could only examine a prisoner, and pass judgment, to be ratified by the Roman authorities.” (The Desire of Ages, page 698). “It was therefore necessary to bring against Christ charges that would be regarded as criminal by the Romans [or State],” Ellen White continued. “An accusation must also be found which would condemn Him in the eyes of the Jews [or Church].” (ibid., DA, p. 698, emphasis supplied). Undeniable Parallels “Not a few among the priests and rulers had been convicted by Christ’s teaching, and only fear of excommunication prevented them from confessing Him. . . ,” Ellen White wrote. “The trial must be so conducted as to unite the members of the Sanhedrin against Christ.” (ibid., DA, p. 698, emphasis supplied). How many there are today, because the “fear of excommunication” keeps them from confessing the truth? Many believe historic Adventism but are afraid to speak. Many leaders and ministers believed the historic Adventist truth in the late 1950's, but were afraid to speak and let M. L. Andreasen stand alone. “If God abhors one sin above another, of which his people are guilty, it is of doing nothing in a case of emergency,” Ellen White wrote. ”Indifference or neutrality in a religious crisis is regarded of God as a grievous crime; and equal to the very worst type of hostility against God.” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 3, page 280, emphasis supplied). “There were two charges which the priests desired to maintain,” Ellen White continued. “If Jesus could be proved a blasphemer, He would be condemned by the Jews [the Church]. If convicted of sedition [disloyalty–treason], it would secure His condemnation by the Romans [the State].” Accused Of Starting An Offshoot Church Opposed To the State “The second charge Annas tried first to establish. . . ,” Ellen White explained. “He thought to draw out some statement to prove that He was seeking to establish a secret society, with the purpose of setting up a new kingdom [government]. Then the priests could deliver Him to the Romans as a disturber of the peace and a creator of insurrection.” (ibid., DA, p. 699). The Saviour contrasted His own manner of work with the methods of His accusers. For months they had hunted Him, striving to entrap Him and bring Him before a secret tribunal, where they might obtain by perjury what it was impossible to gain by fair means. Now they were carrying out their purpose. The midnight seizure by a mob, the mockery and abuse before He was condemned, or even accused, was their manner of work, not His. Their action was in violation of the law. Their own rules [Church Manual] declared that every man should be treated as innocent until proved guilty. By their own rules the priests stood condemned. ibid., Ellen G. White, “Before Annas and the Court of Caiaphas,” The Desire of Ages, page 699. (emphasis supplied). “It was necessary that there should be the form of a legal trial,” Ellen White continued. “This the authorities were determined to hasten. . . .” (ibid., DA, p. 703). Notice that this devious method of dealing with a “dissident” was the policy of the highest leadership of the Church. Today we see these same principles practiced by “the undue assumption of authority” of Church leadership. Christ foresaw that the undue assumption of authority indulged by the scribes and Pharisees would not cease with the dispersion of the Jews. He had a prophetic view of the work of exalting human authority to rule the conscience, which has been so terrible a curse to the church in all ages. And His fearful denunciations of the scribes and Pharisees, and His warnings to the people not to follow these blind leaders, were placed on record as an admonition to future generations. Ellen G. White, The Great Controversy, “The Scriptures a Safeguard,” page 596. (emphasis supplied). It was because the Church leadership at the time of Christ had developed into an erroneous hierarchial form of government, and because the leadership practiced “the undue assumption of authority,” that Jesus declared, “Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.” (Matt. 23:38). Ellen White stated that Christ’s “warnings to the people not to follow these blind leaders, were placed on record as an admonition to future generations.” (ibid.)-- The Apostolic Church -- Christ’s Message To the First Christian Church “I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles [ministers], and are not, and hast found them liars,” Jesus said. “And hast borne, and hast patience, and for my name’s sake hast laboured, and hast not fainted.” (Revelation 2:2, 3). Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -379- The first Christian Church began under the power of the “early rain” of the Holy Spirit. (Acts 2). The last or remnant Church will finish the work under the power of the “latter rain” of the Holy Spirit. (Hosea 6:3; Acts 2:17, 18; Rev. 18). Devout Men Confess Corporate Guilt In the Death Of Christ On the day of Pentecost, when the apostle Peter pleaded with the people to repent and be baptized, “there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven.” know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles [ministers], and are not, and hast found them liars,” Jesus said. “And hast borne, and hast patience, and for my name’s sake hast laboured, and hast not fainted.” (Revelation 2:2, 3). Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -379- The first Christian Church began under the power of the “early rain” of the Holy Spirit. (Acts 2). The last or remnant Church will finish the work under the power of the “latter rain” of the Holy Spirit. (Hosea 6:3; Acts 2:17, 18; Rev. 18). Devout Men Confess Corporate Guilt In the Death Of Christ On the day of Pentecost, when the apostle Peter pleaded with the people to repent and be baptized, “there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven.” (Acts 2:5b). Notice that the crowd Peter was speaking to were “devout” men. The Strong’s Greek dictionary states the word “devout” as “eulabes,” meaning:- “carefully, religiously, pious.” Although they were devout men and members in good standing of the contemporary Jewish Church, Peter called for them to, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins.” (Acts 2:38a). Again, these were “devout men.” What sin had they committed that they should repent? “Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ,” Peter replies. (Acts 2:36, emphasis supplied). These devout men Peter was speaking to were “out of every nation under heaven,” and were gathered at Jerusalem to celebrate Pentecost. They had not been present when Jesus was crucified, yet, as members in good standing of the Jewish Church, they were corporately responsible for the death of Christ. There was still probation for them to repent, and Peter called for them to repent. And they did repent. (Acts 2:37, 38). However, for the Church leadership there was no more probation. Their house had been “left unto them desolate.” (Matthew 23:38). Later when Peter was called in before the Jewish Church leadership for preaching in the name of Christ, he also accused the leadership of being responsible for the death of Christ – but Peter did not call for the leadership to repent! Why? Because they had passed their time of probation. “And it came to pass on the morrow, that their rulers, and elders, and scribes, and Annas the high priest, and Caiaphas, and John, and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of the high priest, were gathered together at Jerusalem,” the Scripture records. “And when they had set them in the midst, they asked, `By what power, or by what name, have ye done this?’” (Acts 4:5-7, emphasis supplied). “Ye rulers of the people, and elders of Israel,” Peter, filled with the Holy Ghost replied. “Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole.” (Acts 4:8-10, emphasis supplied). Notice again that Peter did accuse the leadership of the death of Christ, “whom ye crucified.” But he did not call for them to repent! Their probation was past. There was, however, a limit to God’s mercy for the people. They were given a short period of about forty years to accept the truth of the gospel. In A.D. 70 God’s judgements on the Jewish Church were carried out when Jerusalem and the temple were destroyed by the Roman armies led by Titus. Most of the people in the Jewish Church were killed. Those who survived were scattered throughout the world. There was no way that the early Christians could compromise, or seek recognition and acceptance from the Jewish Church of that day. If they had, they would have been destroyed with the Jewish Church at the destruction of Jerusalem. The early Christians had to separate Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -380- from the mother Church in order to preach and practice the gospel of Christ. In the end, during the time of trouble, the remnant will also separate from Babylon and all organized church denominations. They will flee into the wilderness, there to await the coming of the Lord. (See The Great Controversy, “The Time of Trouble,” pages 613-634). Home Churches In the Apostolic Church The first Christian Church at the time of the apostles had no church buildings, schools, hospitals, or other visible structure. This early Church met in “home churches,” and sometimes in the open by a river side. (Acts 16:13). “Likewise greet the church that is in their house,” the apostle Paul wrote to the Romans. “Salute my well beloved Epaenetus, who is the firstfruits of Achaia unto Christ.” (Romans 16:5, emphasis supplied). “The churches of Asia salute you,”Paul wrote to the Corinthians. “Aquila and Priscilla salute you much in the Lord, with the church that is in their house.” (1 Cor. 16:19, emphasis supplied). “Salute the brethren which are in Laodicea,” Paul wrote to the church at Colosse , “and Nymphas, and the church which is in his house.” (Colossians. 4:15, emphasis supplied). “And to our beloved Apphia,” Paul wrote to Philemon, “and Archippus our fellow soldier, and to the church in thy house.” (Philemon. 1:2, emphasis supplied). “But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God,” Paul wrote to Timothy, “which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.” (1 Tim. 3:15, emphasis supplied). Notice that the apostle Paul does not identify the Christian Church as a cathedral, or denomination, but he saluted “Nymphas, and the church which is in his house.” (ibid., Col.. 4:15b). Then Paul stated that the Church of the living God is “the pillar and ground of the truth.” (ibid., 1 Tim. 3:15). Does the Spirit of Prophecy agree with Paul? Yes, indeed. “God has a church, it is not the great cathedral, neither is it the national establishment, neither is it the various denominations;” Ellen White wrote, “it is the people who love God and keep His commandments.” (The Upward Look, page 315, emphasis supplied). Analogous From the Early Christian Church It is interesting to note the similarities between the first Church, the Church of the early rain, and the last remnant Church, the Church of the latter rain. Both Churches display primitive Godliness. “Before the final visitation of God's judgments upon the earth [seven last plagues] there will be among the people of the Lord such a revival of primitive godliness as has not been witnessed since apostolic times,” Ellen White wrote. “The Spirit and power of God will be poured out upon His children.” (The Great Controversy, page 464, emphasis supplied). The Times Or the Seasons At the formation of the first Christian Church, the apostles were concerned about future events. Just before Jesus ascended to heaven they asked Him, “Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?” (Acts 1:6b). Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -381- “It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power,” Jesus replied to their question of future events. “But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.” (Acts 1:7,8). Notice that it was not Christ’s wish that all His disciples should understand future events. Why? Because they had a mission to accomplish. “And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.” (Mark 16:15). Later, around the year A. D. 90, Jesus did reveal future events to the apostle John on the isle of Patmos. (Revelation 1:1). After the ascension of Jesus the apostles along with the small group returned to the upper room. There they were to await the outpouring of the Holy Spirit before they embarked on their mission of taking the gospel to all the world. “[Jesus] commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me.” (Acts 1:4b). Then returned they unto Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is from Jerusalem a sabbath day’s journey. And when they were come in, they went up into an upper room, where abode both Peter, and James, and John, and Andrew, Philip, and Thomas, Bartholomew, and Matthew, James the son of Alphaeus, and Simon Zelotes, and Judas the brother of James. These all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brethren. (Acts 1:12-14). Scholars of the Greek concur that this was the same upper room in which the Lord celebrated the last supper with the twelve apostles. Notice that while the main body of the Jewish Church was meeting in the temple during this holy period of Pentecost, God’s little band of true people (“the number of names together were about an hundred and twenty,” Acts 1:15b) were meeting in an upper room, and not in the corporate Church. And they “all continued with one accord in prayer and supplication.” (Acts 1:14a). The First Christian Church Business Meeting The Lord had told the little company to wait, but did they continue to wait? No. They decided to have a church business meeting. Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples and said, “Men and brethren, this scripture must needs have been fulfilled, which the Holy Ghost by the mouth of David spake before concerning Judas, which was guide to them that took Jesus.” (Acts 1:15,16). Peter was referring to a text in Psalms, “Yea, mine own familiar friend, in whom I trusted, which did eat of my bread, hath lifted up his heel against me.” (Psalms 41:9). “For he was numbered with us, and had obtained part of this ministry,” Peter continued. “Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out.” (Acts 1:17, 18). Then in this business meeting Peter made a motion that they should ordain a new apostle to take the place of Judas. Although Jesus had chosen the twelve (“he chose twelve, whom also he named apostles,” L uke 6:13), the little company chose two men, and asked the Lord to choose between the two. “Wherefore of these men. . . ,” Peter asked, “must one be ordained to be a witness with us of his resurrection.” (Acts 1:21a, 22b, emphasis supplied). Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -382- The Bible records that “they appointed two, Joseph called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias.” (Acts 1:23). Then they prayed and asked the Lord to select one of the two men. “Thou, Lord, which knowest the hearts of all men, shew whether of these two thou hast chosen,” the apostles prayed, “that he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.” (Acts 1:24b, 25). Then they drew lots, “and the lot fell upon Matthias; and he was numbered with the eleven apostles.” (Acts 1:26). It is interesting to note that Matthias is spoken of only in these two verses, Acts 1:23 and 26. Matthias is not mentioned again in Scripture! But was Matthias the Lord’s choice to be numbered among the twelve? Remember that during his ministry among men Jesus chose the twelve. (Luke 6:13). If Matthias was not the Lord’s choice, then, pray tell, who was the Lord’s choice? “Paul, an apostle, not of men, neither by man,” the Scriptures record, “but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead.” (Galatians 1:1, emphasis supplied). “For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God,” Paul wrote to the Corinthians. “But by the grace of God I am what I am: and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not in vain; but I laboured more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me.” (1 Corinthians 15:9, 10, emphasis supplied). Notice the following nine Scriptures that confirm the apostleship of Paul. (1) Called to be an apostle. (Rom. 1:1). (2) Called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God. (1 Cor. 1:1). (3) An apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God. (2 Cor. 1:1). (4) An apostle, not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father. (Gal. 1:1). (5) An apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God. (Eph. 1:1). (6) An apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God. (Col. 1:1). (7) An apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God our Saviour, and Lord Jesus Christ. (1 Tim. 1:1). 8) An apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God. (2 Tim. 1:1). (9) An apostle of Jesus Christ. (Titas 1:1). “But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man,” Paul wrote to the Galatians. “For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ. (Galatians 1:11, 12, emphasis supplied). The Twelve Foundations On the Holy City In the Revelation the apostle John saw the holy city of God, the new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven. (Rev. 21:2). This city had twelve foundations upon which were written the names of the twelve apostles. (Revelation 21:14). Now, the question is, Who’s name will be on the foundation? Will it be, “Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed him?” (Matt. 10:4). No, we cannot believe that Judas Iscariot’s name will be on the foundation of God’s holy city. There are twelve foundations, there needs to be twelve names. Will the name of Matthais be on the Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -383- foundation to take the place of Judas? Will the name inscribed on the foundation of God’s holy city be that of the apostle Paul? Dear reader the name on the foundation of the city of God must be the name of, “Paul, an apostle, not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead.” (Galatians 1:1). --- The Apostate Roman Catholic Church Of the Dark Ages -- Christ’s Message To the Apostate Church Of the Dark Ages: “Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols,” Jesus said. “And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not. Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds.” (Revelation 2:20-22, emphasis supplied). The apostate Church of Rome did have a General and local Conference (Diocese) offices, church buildings, schools, hospitals, monasteries, convents, and other visible structure. This Church used ecclesiastical and state authority to persecute the saints of the Most High. (See The Great Controversy). There was and is a distinct parallel between the Roman Catholic Church and the Jewish Church at the time of Christ. The Church Of Rome and the Jewish Church “There is a striking similarity between the Church of Rome and the Jewish Church at the time of Christ’s first advent,” Ellen White stated. “While the Jews secretly trampled upon every principle of the law of God, they were outwardly rigorous in the observance of its precepts, loading it down with exactions and traditions that made obedience painful and burdensome.” (The Great Controversy, page 568, emphasis supplied). “As the Jews professed to revere the law, so do Romanists claim to reverence the cross,” Ellen White concluded. “They exalt the symbol of Christ’s sufferings while in their lives they deny Him whom it represents.” (ibid., p. 568, emphasis supplied). In the fourth century the Church at Rome apostatized when she accepted the traditions of Paganism into the Church at the conversion of the Roman Emperor Constantine: “The Roman emperor Constantine's grant of toleration to Christianity (the Edict of Milan, 313) and its rise to the status of an official religion.” (Grolier’s Encyclopedia, Art. “Papacy”). The Church had now committed fornication with the heathen nations around her. The Emperor Constantine passed the first Sunday law (321 A.D.), and at the Council of Laodicea (336 A.D.) the Church ratified Sunday as the day upon which Christians should worship instead of the hated seventh day Sabbath of the Jew. With this apostasy, the birth of the Papacy had begun in fulfillment of the apostle Paul’s prophecy. “Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition,” Paul prophesied. “Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.” (2 Thessalonians 2:3, 4). Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -384- Apostasy In Displaying the Cross Papists place crosses upon their churches, upon their altars, and upon their garments. Everywhere is seen the insignia of the cross. Everywhere it is outwardly honored and exalted. But the teachings of Christ are buried beneath a mass of senseless traditions, false interpretations, and rigorous exactions. The Saviour’s words concerning the bigoted Jews, apply with still greater force to the leaders of the Roman Catholic Church: “They bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.” Matthew 23:4. Conscientious souls are kept in constant terror fearing the wrath of an offended God, while many of the dignitaries of the church are living in luxury and sensual pleasure. Ellen G. White, The Great Controversy, page 568. (emphasis supplied). Does this testimony now apply to Seventh-day Adventists? Today we see that Seventh-day Adventists also “place crosses upon their churches, [and] upon their altars.” Will the next step be for Adventists to place the cross “upon their garments?” Notice that, “The Saviour’s words concerning the bigoted Jews, apply with still greater force to the leaders of the Roman Catholic Church.” Moreover, the people who believe in this apostate church system live in fear “while many of the dignitaries of the church are living in luxury and sensual pleasure.” Today one could apply this testimony to the contemporary Seventh-day Adventist Church. The leaders are “bigoted,” while the people who believe in the SDA Church system live in fear of ecclesiastical authority, “while many of the dignitaries of the church are living in luxury and sensual pleasure.” Rome Ruled Supreme For 1, 200 Years “The periods here mentioned–`forty and two months,’ and `a thousand two hundred and threescore days’–are the same, alike representing the time in which the church of Christ was to suffer oppression from Rome,” Ellen White wrote. “The 1260 years of papal supremacy began in A.D. 538, and would therefore terminate in 1798.” (The Great Controversy, 1888 Edition, page 266, emphasis supplied).
The True Church In the Wilderness Christ’s Message To the Church In the Wilderness: “I know thy works and where thou dwellest, even where Satan’s seat is: and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith,” Jesus said, “even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth.” (Revelation 2:13, emphasis supplied). The Church in the wilderness had no General and local Conference offices, church buildings, schools, hospitals or other visible structure. They conducted their services in the mountains and caves of the earth. (See The Great Controversy, “The Waldenses,” pages 61-78). This Church met in the wilderness because of persecution from the Roman Catholic Church. There is a distinct parallel between this Church in the Wilderness and the Remnant Church near the close of probation. Amid the gloom that settled upon the earth during the long period of papal supremacy, the light of truth could not be wholly extinguished. In every age there were witnesses for God–men who cherished faith in Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -385- Christ as the only mediator between God and man, who held the Bible as the only rule of life, and who hallowed the true Sabbath. How much the world owes to these men, posterity will never know. . .. Ellen G. White, The Great Controversy, page 61. Notice that “men who cherished faith in Christ as the only mediator between God and man,” also “held the Bible as the only rule of life.” Moreover these men of God “hallowed the true Sabbath.” The final “remnant” Church will also hold the Bible as the only rule of faith. “God will have a people upon the earth to maintain the Bible and the Bible only, as the standard of all doctrines and the basis of all reforms,” Ellen White wrote. “The opinions of learned men, the deductions of science, the creeds or decisions of ecclesiastical councils, as numerous and discordant as are the churches which they represent, the voice of the majority--not one nor all of these should be regarded as evidence for or against any point of religious faith. . ..” (The Great Controversy, Page 595, emphasis supplied). “They were branded as heretics, their motives impugned [attacked], their characters maligned, their writings suppressed, misrepresented, or mutilated,” Ellen White wrote about the Waldenses. “Yet they stood firm, and from age to age maintained their faith in its purity, as a sacred heritage for the generations to come.” (ibid.). This is indeed a clear picture of the historic Adventist movement today. They are “branded as heretics,” and their motives are attacked. Indeed, “their characters maligned,” and “their writings [are] suppressed.” Go to any Adventist Book Center and try to buy books by either E. J. Waggoner or A. T. Jones. Their writings are “misrepresented, or mutilated.” Pioneer Adventist writings have been “revised” many times. The Roman Catholic Church Receives A Deadly Wound “And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death. . ..(Revelation 13:3a). “At that time a French army entered Rome and made the pope a prisoner, and he died in exile,” Ellen White concluded. “Though a new pope was soon afterward elected, the papal hierarchy has never since been able to wield the power which it before possessed. The Deadly Wound Healed “And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed.” (Revelation 13:3a, emphasis supplied). “The Lateran Treaty, signed on Feb. 11, 1929, by Benito Mussolini for the Italian government and Cardinal Pietro Gasparri for the papacy, settled the vexatious question of the relationship between the Holy See and Italy.” (Robin Buss, “The Lateran Treaty,” The New Groilers Multimedia Encyclopedia, Release 6). Reporting on the signing of this document, the San Francisco Chronicle, Tuesday, February 12, 1929, carried the story on the front page with a photograph of Cardinal Pietro Gasparri and Benito Mussolini signing the document. The caption above the photograph read, “Heal Wound Of Many Years.” Ellen White knew, as did all pioneer Seventh-day Adventists that the deadly wound would be healed. The Roman Catholic Church Today Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -386- “The Roman Church now presents a fair front to the world, covering with apologies her record of horrible cruelties,” Ellen White warned. “She has clothed herself in Christlike garments; but she is unchanged.” (The Great Controversy, page 571, emphasis supplied). “Every principle of the papacy that existed in past ages exist today,” Ellen White continued. “The doctrines devised in the darkest ages are still held.” (ibid., GC, p. 571, emphasis supplied). Notice that the Roman Catholic Church “now presents a fair front to the world.” The Catholic Church now covers “her record of horrible cruelties” with apologies. She wears “Christlike garments, but she is unchanged.” The apostate doctrines “devised in the darkest ages are still held.” Let none deceive themselves. The papacy that Protestants are now so ready to honor is the same that ruled the world in the days of the Reformation, when men of God stood up, at the peril of their lives, to expose her iniquity. She possesses the same pride and arrogant assumption that lorded it over kings and princes, and claimed the prerogatives of God. Her spirit is no less cruel and despotic now than when she crushed out human liberty and slew the saints of the Most High. ibid., Ellen G. White, The Great Controversy, page 571. (emphasis supplied). Today, in the year 1999, 84 years after the death of Ellen White, and 109 years after this statement was first penned, “his deadly wound [is] healed” and all the world is wondering after the beast. (Rev. 13:3b, emphasis supplied). Are we also wondering after the beast? “When men who profess to serve God ignore His parental character and depart from honor and righteousness in dealing with their fellowmen, Satan exults, for he has inspired them with his attributes,” Ellen White counseled. “They are following in the track of Romanism.” (Testimonies to Ministers, page 362, emphasis supplied). The Fallen Churches Of Modern Babylon Christ’s Message To the Churches Of Modern Babylon “And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.” (Rev. 18:4, emphasis supplied). The modern-day Churches of Babylon do have headquarter offices and local diocese, church buildings, schools, hospitals and other visible structure. To these churches the angel, “cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.” (Rev. 18:2). Laodicea, the Corporate Seventh-day Adventist Church Christ’s Message To Laodicea “I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot,” Jesus said. “So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.” (Rev. 3:15,16, emphasis supplied). “Will the churches heed the Laodicean message?” Ellen White asks. “Will they repent, or will they, notwithstanding that the most solemn message of truth--the third angel's message--is being proclaimed to the world, go on in sin?” (Manuscript Releases, Vol. 19, page 176, emphasis supplied). Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -387- “If the church of God becomes lukewarm, it does not stand in favor with God any more than do the churches that are represented as having fallen and become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and the cage of every unclean and hateful bird,” Ellen White warned. “Those who have had opportunities to hear and receive the truth and who have united with the Seventh-day Adventist church, calling themselves the commandment-keeping people of God, and yet possess no more vitality and consecration to God than do the nominal churches, will receive of the plagues of God just as verily as the churches who oppose the law of God.” (ibid., MR, Vol. 19, page 176, emphasis supplied). “Only those that are sanctified through the truth,” Ellen White concluded, “will compose the royal family in the heavenly mansions Christ has gone to prepare for those that love Him and keep His commandments.” ((ibid., MR, Vol. 19, page 176, emphasis supplied). “Licentiousness, unlawful intimacy, and unholy practices are coming in among us in a large degree; and ministers who are handling sacred things are guilty of sin in this respect,” Ellen White wrote. “They are coveting their neighbors' wives, and the seventh commandment is broken.” (Manuscript Releases, Vol. 21, page 380). The Contemporary Seventh-day Adventist Church – A Sister To Babylon “We are in danger of becoming a sister to fallen Babylon, of allowing our churches to become corrupted, and filled with every foul spirit, a cage for every unclean and hateful bird. . ..” (ibid., MR, Vol. 21, page 380, emphasis supplied). Ancient and Modern Israel We have learned that there was and is a distinct similarity between the Roman Catholic Church and the Jewish Church at the time of Christ. There is also a distinct similarity between the Seventh-day Adventist Church and the Jewish Church at the time of Christ. “The trials of the children of Israel, and their attitude just before the first coming of Christ,” Ellen White wrote, “illustrate the position of the people of God in their experience before the second coming of Christ.” (Review and Herald, 1890, No. 7, emphasis supplied). “Satan’s snares are laid for us as verily as they were laid for the children of Israel just prior to their entrance into the land of Canaan,” Ellen White warned. “We are repeating the history of that people.” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 5, page 160, emphasis supplied). I was pointed back to ancient Israel. But two of the adults of the vast army that left Egypt entered the land of Canaan. Their dead bodies were strewn in the wilderness because of their transgressions. Modern Israel are in greater danger of forgetting God and being led into idolatry than were His ancient people. Ellen G. White, Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 1, page 609. (emphasis supplied). “The sin of ancient Israel was in disregarding the expressed will of God and following their own way according to the leadings of unsanctified hearts,” Ellen White wrote. “Modern Israel are fast following in their footsteps, and the displeasure of the Lord is as surely resting upon them.” (ibid., 5T. p. 94, emphasis supplied). When I study the Scriptures, I am alarmed for the Israel of God in these last days. They are exhorted to flee from idolatry. I fear that they are asleep and so conformed to the world that it would be difficult to discern between him that serveth God and him that serveth Him not. The distance is widening between Christ and His people, and lessening between them and the world. The marks of distinction between Christ’s professed Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -388- people and the world have almost disappeared. Like ancient Israel, they follow after the abominations of the nations [churches] around them. Ellen G. White, Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 1, page 277. (emphasis supplied). “I saw that many who profess to believe the truth for these last days think it strange that the children of Israel murmured as they journeyed; that after the wonderful dealings of God with them, they should be so ungrateful as to forget what He had done for them,” Ellen White stated. “Said the angel: `Ye have done worse than they.’” (ibid., 1T. p. 129, emphasis supplied). Like ancient Israel the church has dishonored her God by departing from the light, neglecting her duties, and abusing her high and exalted privilege of being peculiar and holy in character. Her members have violated their covenant to live for God and Him only. They have joined with the selfish and world-loving. Pride, the love of pleasure, and sin have been cherished, and Christ has departed. His Spirit has been quenched in the church. Ellen G. White, Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 2, page 442. (emphasis supplied). “Ancient Israel were enticed into sin when they ventured into forbidden association with the heathen,” Ellen White wrote. “In a similar manner are modern Israel led astray. . ..” (The Great Controversy, page 568, emphasis supplied). “How frequently ancient Israel rebelled, and how often they were visited with judgments, and thousands slain, because they would not heed the commands of God who had chosen them!” Ellen White warned. “The Israel of God in these last days are in constant danger of mingling with the world and losing all signs of being the chosen people of God. . ..” (ibid., 1T, pp. 283, 284, emphasis supplied). “The condition of society to-day is the same as when God presented before Israel the abominations of the heathen,” Ellen White concluded, “and the same warnings are necessary to the remnant people. . ..” (The Signs of the Times, August 26, 1889, emphasis supplied). Notice the date, 1889, over one hundred years ago! What in the world would Ellen White say today about the condition of the world and the condition of the Church? It is clear from these passages of inspiration that there is an undeniable parallel between ancient Israel and the corporate “Laodicean” Seventh-day Adventist Church. The Remnant Of Israel There is a distinct similarity between this Remnant Church and the Apostolic Church. Christ’s message to the Remnant Church at the end of the Christian era is the same message He gave to the Apostolic or first Christian church at the beginning of the Christian era. Christ’s Message To the Remnant Church “I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles [ministers], and are not, and hast found them liars,” Jesus said. “And hast borne, and hast patience, and for my name’s sake hast laboured, and hast not fainted.” (Revelation 2:2, 3; emphasis supplied). “The remnant of Israel shall not do iniquity, nor speak lies; neither shall a deceitful tongue be found in their mouth. . .,” Zephaniah prophesied.(Zephaniah 3:13, emphasis supplied). “And in their mouth was found no guile,” the apostle John agreed, “for they are without fault before the throne of God.” (Revelation 14:5, emphasis supplied). Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -389- The remnant Church at the time of the end will not have General and local Conference offices, church buildings, schools, hospitals or other visible structure. There is a distinct similarity between this Remnant Church and the Church in the Wilderness. Like the Apostolic and the Wilderness churches, the last Christians who live just before Jesus comes again will also worship in home churches, in the wilderness and remote places of the earth. Some will be cast into prison. intended that no authority should be known in it but His own.” (Testimonies to Ministers, pp. 15,16, emphasis supplied). The church is built upon Christ as its foundation; it is to obey Christ as its head. It is not to depend upon men, nor be controlled by men. Many claim that a position of trust in the church gives them authority to dictate what other men shall believe and what they shall do. This claim God does not sanction. The Saviour declares, ‘All ye are brethren.’ All are exposed to temptation, and are liable to err. Upon no finite being can we depend for guidance. The rock of faith is the living presence of Christ in the church. Upon this the weakest may depend, and those who think themselves the strongest will prove to be the wea kest, unless they make Christ their efficiency. ‘Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm.’ The Lord is ‘the Rock, his work is perfect,’ ‘blessed are all they that put their trust in him.’” Ellen G. White, Desire of Ages (page 491) (emphasis supplied). Is the apostle Peter the rock upon which the church is built? No. The church is not built on weak and finite man. Jesus Christ is the rock upon which the church is built. “Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Zion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded,” the apostle Peter said. “He is the chief corner stone.” (I Peter 2:6). On Christ the solid rock I stand,all other ground is sinking sand. A Time Of Trouble “Satan will then plunge the inhabitants of the earth into one great, final trouble,” Ellen White wrote. “As the angels of God cease to hold in check the fierce winds of human passion, all the elements of strife will be let loose. The whole world will be involved in ruin more terrible than that which came upon Jerusalem of old.” (The Great Controversy, “The Time of Trouble,” page 614, emphasis supplied). -- The Remnant Church Again In the Wilderness -- As the decree issued by the various rulers of Christendom against commandment keepers shall withdraw the protection of government and abandon them to those who desire their destruction, the people of God will flee from the cities and villages and associate together in companies, dwelling in the most desolate and solitary places. Many will find refuge in the strongholds of the mountains. Like the Christians of the Piedmont valleys, they will make the high places of the earth their sanctuaries and will thank God for “the munitions of rocks.” Isaiah 33:16. But many of all nations and of all classes, high and low, rich and poor, black and white, will be cast into the most unjust and cruel bondage. The beloved of God pass weary days, bound in chains, shut in by prison bars, sentenced to be slain, some apparently left to die of starvation in dark and loathsome dungeons. No human ear is open to hear their moans; no human hand is ready to lend them help. Ellen G. White, “The Time of Trouble,” The Great Controversy, page 626, emphasis supplied). Notice that at this time God’s true people are not working at their jobs in the General, Union, or local Conference offices. Neither are they attending the local churches. Neither will God’s people be working at or attending church schools, or universities. Neither will they be working in the “Health Systems/East/West/North or South. Neither will they be working at other Church hospitals. Neither will they be working at any other visible Seventh-day Adventist Church institution. Where, pray tell, will God’s remnant people be? “The people of God will flee from the cities and villages and associate together in companies, dwelling in the most desolate and solitary places,” Ellen White replies. “Many will find refuge in the strongholds of the mountains. Like the Christians of the Piedmont valleys, they will make the high places of the earth their sanctuaries and will thank God for `the munitions of rocks.’ Isaiah 33:16.” (ibid., The Great Controversy, page 626, emphasis supplied). What Is the True Remnant Church and Who Are the Members? If the church is not General and local Conference offices, church buildings, schools, hospitals or other visible structure, then, pray tell, what is the Church? Who are the members of the true remnant church in the end time? “Where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them,” Jesus replies. (Matthew 18:20). Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -390- “Where Christ is even among the humble few, this is Christ’s church, for the presence of the High and Holy One who inhabiteth eternity can alone constitute a church,” Ellen White comments on Matthew 18:20. “Where two or three are present who love and obey the commandments of God, Jesus there presides, let it be in the desolate place of the earth, in the wilderness, in the city enclosed in prison walls.” (The Upward Look, page 315, emphasis supplied). Notice that in the above statement Ellen White declares that where two or three Christians are gathered together, “who love and obey the commandments of God,” this is God’s true church and “Jesus there presides” among them. Not only that, but in stronger language Ellen White stated that this “alone constitutes a church.” -- True Remnant Church A Spiritual Temple Of Living Stones -- “All the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord,” the apostle Paul wrote, “in whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.” (Ephesians 2:21, 22). “The Stones which are in God’s sacred temple are not collected from the mountains of Judea but gathered from the nations, kindreds, and tongues and people,” Ellen White comments on Ephesians 2:21, 22. “They are not lifeless material that must be prepared with hammer and chisel, but living stones which emit light.” (ibid., UL, p. 373, emphasis supplied). Notice that the stones of Christ’s church “are not lifeless material . . . but living stones which emit light.” These living stones are gathered from all “nations, kindreds, and tongues and people.” “The great cleaver of truth has taken them from the quarry of the world and placed them under the hand of the great Master Builder, the Lord of the temple,” Ellen White continued, “and He is polishing them in His workshop, which is this world, that all the rough edges and crookedness may be removed and then hammered and chiseled and squared by the truth of God, polished and refined, ready to fill their place in God’s spiritual temple, that they may grow up a holy temple for God.” (ibid., UL, p. 373, emphasis supplied). Notice the following four important points in this statement. (1) It is the truth that brings the living stones into God’s spiritual temple. (2) They are placed there under the hand of Jesus Christ, the great Master Builder. They are not placed there under the hand of man. (3) It is Jesus, and not man, that is polishing all the rough edges and crookedness from the living stones. (4) The reason for the polishing is that the living stones may be fitted for a place in God’s spiritual temple! The Members Of God’s Spiritual Temple Are An Holy Priesthood “Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood,” the apostle Peter wrote, “to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.” (1 Peter 2:5, emphasis supplied). “This building represents God’s spiritual temple, which is composed of material gathered out of every nation, and tongue, and people, of all grades, high and low, rich and poor, learned and Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -391- unlearned,” Ellen White commented on 1 Peter 2:5. “These are not dead substances, to be fitted by hammer and chisel. They are living stones, quarried out from the world by the truth, and the great Master Builder, the Lord of the temple, is now hewing and polishing them, and fitting them for their respective places in the spiritual temple.” (ibid., UL, p. 281, emphasis supplied). Notice once again that, (a) it is the truth that brings the rough stones into the living temple, and, (b) it is the Master’s hewing and polishing that fits the living stones for a place in the living temple. It is not the work of man to build the living temple of God. The Completed Living Temple “When completed, this temple will be perfect in all its parts,” Ellen White concluded, “the object of admiration of angels and men, for its builder and maker is God.” (ibid., UL, p. 281, emphasis supplied). The perfecting of the saints, fitting them for translation. This will be the condition of God’s final, remnant, last generation, living temple or living church, during the latter rain and the seven last plagues. This is the time when man must stand without a heavenly High Priest mediator between the Father and mankind. Notice also that the reason why this final generation, spiritual temple or church is “the object of admiration of angels and men,” is because “its builder and maker is God” and not the building and maker of man. “Before the final visitation of God's judgments upon the earth there will be among the people of the Lord such a revival of primitive godliness as has not been witnessed since apostolic times,” Ellen White prophesied. “The Spirit and power of God will be poured out upon His children. . ..” (The Great Controversy, page 464). The enemy of souls desires to hinder this work; and before the time for such a movement shall come, he will endeavor to prevent it by introducing a counterfeit. In those churches which he can bring under his deceptive power he will make it appear that God's special blessing is poured out; there will be manifest what is thought to be great religious interest. Multitudes will exult that God is working marvelously for them, when the work is that of another spirit. Under a religious guise, Satan will seek to extend his influence over the Christian world. ibid., Ellen G. White, “Modern Revivals,” The Great Controversy, page 464. (emphasis supplied). -- What Is Not the True Remnant Church -- “God has a church,” Ellen White stated. “It is not the great cathedral, neither is it the national establishment, neither is it the various denominations; it is the people who love God and keep His commandments.” (ibid., UL, p. 315, emphasis supplied). Notice that Ellen White states that the church is not “the national establishment,” and it is “not the great cathedral,” and, “neither is it the various denominations.” This includes the Seventhday Adventist denomination. If God’s true church is not the “established” General Conference, if it is not “the cathedral” or church buildings, if it is not the “denomination,” then what is the true church? “It is the people who love God and keep His commandments,” Ellen White replies. It is the community of believers, the people, the living stones that make up God’s living temple. That, dear reader, is God’s true church in these last days. --- Man’s Visible Temple -- In contrast to God’s living temple is man’s visible temple. The claim is made that Jesus Christ is the head of this visible temple, but in reality man is the head of this visible temple. Throughout Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -392- the history of the Christian church, be it Protestant or Roman Catholic, members have been conditioned to believe that God has bestowed special ecclesiastical authority upon leaders of the corporate church structure. But is this dogma really Biblical? This belief, that God has given to certain men special ecclesiastical authority over the flock, has led to the formation of the Papal Church system, or what the Bible calls the Beast and the Antichrist. (Dan. 7; Rev. 13; Rev. 17). This will and has led the Christian world into forming an image of the Papacy – an image of the beast. The visible, corporate structure of the Christian Church was formed for the purpose of organizing the work for the spreading of the gospel to the ends of the earth. It has never been the duty of the corporate Church to rule over the flock of God. The leadership of the Christian Church were not to define doctrine or to form a creed or a Church Manual filled with worldly policies that men must obey. The leaders were not given the power to excommunicate (disfellowship) from the Church those who do not follow their Creeds, “Statement of Fundamental Beliefs,” or recognize their undue assumption of ecclesiastical authority. “In the very courts of the temple [church], scenes will be enacted that few realize..,” Ellen White warned. “Vengeance will be executed against those who sit in the gates deciding what the people should have.” (Manuscript 15, 1886, emphasis supplied). The Roman Catholic Church Claims To Interpret Scripture “Since Christ, however, did not determine many points of worship in non-essential matters, the Church has the authority to do so.” (Bertrand L. Conway, Miniature Question Box, page 63, emphasis supplied). Catholics are subject to their respective leaders who rule them. They must recognize the supreme authority of the Church in matters of religion. A person who deliberately refuses to accept the legitimate and supreme authority of the Church and their Priests in matters of religion cannot be a Roman Catholic. ibid., Bertrand L. Conway, Miniature Question Box, page 63. (emphasis supplied). “The Holy See reserves to itself the right to pass finally on the origin of the present reading [1 John 5:7].” (Footnote, Saint Joseph, New Catholic Edition, 1962). The Contemporary SDA Church Also Claims To Interpret Scripture “It is our responsibility to study the Scriptures for ourselves, to ask for the guidance of the Holy Spirit, to submit our understandings to those in the church who are able to judge our findings, and then to abide by the decisions of the church in order to maintain the unity of the church. (Senior Sabbath School Lessons Quarterly, “God and Our Destiny,” First Quarter, 1987, page 92, emphasis supplied). In this statement contemporary Seventh-day Adventist leadership concurs perfectly with this Roman Catholic concept that, The Holy See,” or Church leadership, “reserves to itself the right to pass finally on the origin of the present reading,“ or interpretation of Scripture. Leadership also concurs with the Catholic statement that Adventists are also “subject to their respective leaders who rule them.“ They agree that Adventists “must recognize the supreme authority of the Church in matters of religion.” Leadership agrees that “a person who deliberately refuses to accept the legitimate and supreme authority of the Church and their pastors in matters of religion Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -393- cannot be a Seventh-day Adventist.” But this policy is in direct opposition to the counsel of the Spirit of Prophecy. The Roman Church reserves to the clergy the right to interpret the Scriptures. . .. Though the Reformation gave the Scriptures to all, yet the selfsame principle which was maintained by Rome prevents multitudes in Protestant churches from searching the Bible for themselves. They are taught to accept its teachings as interpreted by the church; and there are thousands who dare receive nothing, however plainly revealed in Scripture, that is contrary to their creed or the established teaching of their church. Ellen G. White, The Great Controversy, page 596. (emphasis supplied). “Notwithstanding the Bible is full of warnings against false teachers, many are ready thus to commit the keeping of their souls to the clergy,” Ellen White wrote. “There are today thousands of professors of religion who can give no other reason for points of faith which they hold than that they were so instructed by their religious leaders. (ibid., GC, p. 597, emphasis supplied). “They pass by the Saviour’s teachings almost unnoticed, and place implicit confidence in the words of the ministers,” Ellen White stated further. “But are ministers infallible? How can we trust our souls to their guidance unless we know from God’s word that they are light bearers?” (ibid., GC, p. 597, emphasis supplied). “A lack of moral courage to step aside from the beaten track of the world leads many to follow in the steps of learned men,” Ellen White warned, “and by their reluctance to investigate for themselves, they are becoming hopelessly fastened in the chains of error.” (ibid., GC, p. 597, emphasis supplied; See entire chapter, “The Scriptures A Safeguard,” The Great Controversy, pages 593- 602). -- Peter and the Keys -- And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter [Petros:- a piece of rock] , and upon this rock [Petra:- mass of rock] I will build my church; and the gates of hell [hades:- grave] shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. (Matthew 16:18, 19). The Roman Catholic Church uses this text from the gospel of Matthew to prove that the Popes receive a direct line of authority given to Peter, and as such they receive the “Keys of the Kingdom.” As they do the cross, the Roman Church places the insignia of the “Keys” upon almost everything. The Roman Church and the Seventh-day Adventist Church believe that “whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” But how does the Spirit of Prophecy comment on these texts? “When every specification which Christ has given has been carried out in the true, Christian spirit,” Ellen White wrote, “then, and then only, Heaven ratifies the decision of the church, because its members have the mind of Christ, and do as He would do were He upon the earth.” (Letter 1c, 1890; Selected Messages, Bk. 3, page 22, emphasis supplied). “As surely as men in responsible positions become lifted up in their own esteem, and act as though they were to lord it over their brethren,” Ellen White commented, “they will render many decisions which heaven cannot ratify.” (The Home Missionary, February 1, 1892, emphasis supplied). Notice the counsel is that, “When every specification which Christ has given has been carried out in the true, Christian spirit . . . because its members have the mind of Christ,” and only as the Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -394- leadership “do as He would do were He upon the earth . . . then, and then only, Heaven ratifies the decision of the church.” (ibid., Letter 1c, 1890). However, “As surely as men in responsible positions become lifted up in their own esteem, and act as though they were to lord it over their brethren, they will render many decisions which heaven cannot ratify.” (ibid., The Home Missionary, 2/1/92). If the leadership of the Church does not possess the Keys, who then does have the Keys? Who Has the Keys? “I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen,” Jesus replies, “and have the keys of hell [hades:- grave] and of death.” (Revelation 1:18) -- The Voice Of God On Earth -- Is the General Conference, while in session, the voice of God to Seventh-day Adventists? The leadership of the Church claim that it is. “The General Conference, while in secession, is God’s voice on earth to Seventh-day Adventists in all matters of faith and practice,” William G. Johnsson, Editor of the Adventist Review stated. “The 27 Statement of Fundamental Beliefs are to be adhered to by all employees and members of the church, under threat of discipline by the local church board or ruling conference committee.” (William Johnsson to Dr. Walter R. Martin, (author, The Kingdom of the Cults). Statement made on The John Ankerberg Show. (CBN Television Network, 1986). Does God indeed speak through the General Conference? Does the Spirit of Prophecy endorse the view that “The General Conference, while in secession, is God’s voice on earth to Seventhday Adventists? “The people have lost confidence in those who have the management of the work,” Ellen White stated. “Yet we hear that the voice of the Conference is the voice of God. Every time I have heard this, I have thought it was almost blasphemy. (Manuscript 37, 1901, p. 8: Manuscript Release 365, emphasis supplied). “And in reference to our conference,” Ellen White wrote, “it is repeated o’er and o’er and o’er again, that it is the voice of God, and therefore everything must be referred to the conference and have the conference voice in regard to permission or restriction or what shall be and what shall not be done in the various fields . . . the principle is wrong.” (Spalding-Magan manuscript, p. 163, emphasis supplied). The Lord declares that His church is not to be governed by human rules or precedents. Men are not capable of ruling the church. God is our Ruler. I am oppressed with the thought of the objectionable human management seen in our work. God says, Hands off. Rule yourselves before you attempt to rule others. Strange things have been done, things that God abhors. For men to claim that the voice of their councils in their past management is the voice of God seems to me to be almost blasphemy. Ellen G. White, Manuscript 35, 1901 (emphasis supplied). One hundred years ago Ellen White stated, “As for the voice of the General Conference, there is no voice from God through that body that is reliable.” (Manuscript Releases Vol. 17, p. 178, emphasis supplied). What would she say today? Is the General Conference more spiritual, more in touch with Christ today than they were one hundred years ago? I think not. Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -395- “They [the General Conference] have sought to establish their own authority, while betraying the cause of God,” Ellen wrote one hundred years ago. “While making decisions, and devising and planning, they have tried to make their oppressive human orders as the voice of God to His people.” (ibid., MR,, Vol. 17, p. 209, emphasis supplied). “The man who magnifies his own office in working in any line to bind about the conscience of another, be he the president of the General Conference, president of a smaller conference, or the elder or deacon or lay member of a church, he is out of God’s line..,” Ellen White concluded. “But in the present condition of things, if one stands fast to his integrity, he is by some scorned, scouted, criticized, and dropped out if it can be brought about.” (ibid., MR, Vol. 17. p. 225, emphasis supplied). This principle is still true today. One only has to observe the number of persons excommunicated from the Church in recent years. It is more than clear from these statements that Ellen White did not believe that the General Conference is the voice of God to the people. Why is it that throughout the history of the Christian church, leadership insists on appointing to themselves the place of God on earth? This, without doubt, is one of the identifying marks of Antichrist. The True Condition Of the Corporate “Laodicean” SDA Church If God is not speaking through the General Conference, then who’s voice is being heard? It is possible for the leaders of the Seventh-day Adventist Church to be led by Satan. The leadership of men is not infallible. If this were true we would be Roman Catholics. They were the first to believe that their Church leaders were infallible. The result of this has been in various ways. The sacred character of the cause of God is no longer realized at the center of the work. The voice from Battle Creek [or Silver Spring], which has been regarded as authority in counseling how the work should be done, is no longer the voice of God; but it is the voice of– whom? From whence does it come, and where is its vital power? This state of things is maintained by men who should have been disconnected from the work long ago. These men do not scruple to quote the word of God as their authority, but the god who is leading them is a false god. Ellen G. White, Manuscript Releases, Vol. 17 (pages 185, 106) (emphasis supplied). Notice that the establishment of the Church structure was intended for “authority in counseling how the work should be done.” Never was the authority of Church leadership intended to dictate doctrine in a creed, a Statement of Beliefs, or a Church Manual, telling the people what they should have, or what they should believe. “Under the cloak of Christianity and sanctification, far-spreading and manifest ungodliness will prevail to a terrible degree and will continue until Christ comes to be glorified in all them that believe,” Ellen White warned. “In the very courts of the temple [Church], scenes will be enacted that few realize.” (Manuscript 15, 1886, emphasis supplied). “God’s people will, be proved and tested, that He may discern ‘between him that serveth God and him that serveth Him not,’” Ellen White concluded. “Vengeance will be executed against those who sit in the gates deciding what the people should have [believe].” (ibid., Manuscript 15, 1886, emphasis supplied). The Bible Alone Is the Voice Of God To the People Chapter 19 The Remnant Church – Corporate or Spiritual? -396- “We are not to turn from One Mighty in counsel to ask guidance of men,” Ellen White replies. “Let those who are inclined to do this read and receive the Bible as the word of God to them. The Bible is the voice of God to His people.” (Review and Herald, Vol. 5, p. 224, emphasis supplied). The Bible is the voice of God to his people. Amazing! Has not this always been the by-word of all true Protestant Christians? But the Seventh-day Adventists have taken the Reformation a step further – “the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.” Jesus Is the Head and Foundation Stone Of the Church “Consider, my brethren and sisters, that the Lord has a people, a chosen people, to be His own, His own fortress, which He holds in a sin-stricken, revolted world,” Ellen White stated, “and He intended that no authority should be known in it but His own.” (Testimonies to Ministers, pp. 15,16, emphasis supplied). The church is built upon Christ as its foundation; it is to obey Christ as its head. It is not to depend upon men, nor be controlled by men. Many claim that a position of trust in the church gives them authority to dictate what other men shall believe and what they shall do. This claim God does not sanction. The Saviour declares, ‘All ye are brethren.’ All are exposed to temptation, and are liable to err. Upon no finite being can we depend for guidance. The rock of faith is the living presence of Christ in the church. Upon this the weakest may depend, and those who think themselves the strongest will prove to be the wea kest, unless they make Christ their efficiency. ‘Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm.’ The Lord is ‘the Rock, his work is perfect,’ ‘blessed are all they that put their trust in him.’” Ellen G. White, Desire of Ages (page 491) (emphasis supplied). Is the apostle Peter the rock upon which the church is built? No. The church is not built on weak and finite man. Jesus Christ is the rock upon which the church is built. “Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Zion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded,” the apostle Peter said. “He is the chief corner stone.” (I Peter 2:6). On Christ the solid rock I stand,all other ground is sinking sand.