

Inside Editorial Box Of the Barnhouse Article:
Have the Seventh-day Adventists been proselytizers? During the course of our dealings with Adventist
leaders we brought up the complaints, common to the mission field, that Adventist missionaries and
workers have been proselytizers. The leaders affirmed vehemently that they have been doing everything
possible to prevent such proselytizing, and, while there may have been such cases in the past, they hold that
such methods are not now in use. In cooperation with them we will gladly receive from any missionaries in
the world fully documented instances of such proselytization that have taken place during the past two
years. Such documentation, if any, sent to the Rev. Mr. Walter R. Martin, in care of Eternity, will be
forwarded to Adventist leaders, who have promised a thorough investigation.
ibid., Donald Grey Barnhouse, “Are Seventh-day Adventists Christians?” Eternity, October, 1956
(emphasis supplied).
The word “proselytize” means to make an Adventist out of Baptist, Lutheran or other Christians.
With this kind of a policy on “proselytizing” how is it possible for Seventh-day Adventist
missionaries or evangelists to call God’s people out of Babylon and into the present truth of the
Advent movement? It is not possible. The new position is that we should simply be Christian
brethren with the Evangelical Sunday-keeping churches of Babylon. We should not “proselytize”
their members and make Seventh-day Adventists out of them. After all, one current Adventist
leader goes so far as to state that the Pope of Rome is his Christian brother. (Mitchell A. Tyner,
The Columbian Union Visitor, June 1, 1995, p. 6).
Again, this policy which was told to the Evangelicals is in perfect harmony with the policy
adopted at the 1926 General Conference which stated that, “In the desire to avoid occasion for
misunderstanding or friction in the matter of relationship to the work of other societies, the
following statement of principles are set forth as a guidance to our workers in mission fields in
their contacts with other religious organizations”:
#1. We recognize every agency that lifts up Christ before man as a part of the divine plan for the
evangelization of the world, and we hold in high esteem the Christian men and women in other
communions who are engaged in winning souls to Christ.
“Relationship To Other Societies,” General Conference Executive Committee, 1926. (emphasis
supplied).
It must be remembered that this policy was voted sixteen years after the death of Ellen White.
Testimony would have been given immediately against this betrayal of the three angel’s messages.
“There is as great a difference in our faith and that of nominal professors, as the heavens are higher
than the earth,” Ellen White stated. “True brotherhood can never be maintained by
compromising principle.” (Spiritual Gifts, Vol. 2, p. 300; Manuscript 23b, 7/25/96, emphasis
supplied).
“God has committed to us,” Ellen White wrote, “the special truths for this time to make known
to the world.” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol, 5, p. 236).
In Chapter #11, “A warning, and Its Rejection,” and Chapter #13, “The Final Atonement,” we
Chapter 12 The Ultimate Betraya
-242-
discovered that the leadership of the Seventh-day Adventist Church accepted a new Christ and
changed the time of the final Atonement in the first angel’s message from the heavenly sanctuary
to the cross. In the Evangelical conferences of 1955-56 the leadership admitted those changes to
the Evangelical church leaders of Babylon. In 1957 the Church leadership published those
changes to the world in the “official” book, Seventh-day Adventists Answer, Questions on Doctrine.
In Chapter #1, “The Invaders,” we learned that the Seventh-day Adventist Church leadership
rejected the third angel’s message when they stated to the world in a Supreme Court Brief that “it
is not good Seventh-day Adventism to express, as Mrs. Tobler has done, an aversion to Roman
Catholicism as such.” (United States District Court, Northern District of California. Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission vs. Pacific Press Publishing Association, Civ. No. 74-2025 CBR. Reply Brief for Defendants
in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment. (emphasis supplied).
Now we have learned in the past three Chapters that the Church leadership has rejected the first
and second angel’s messages as taught by pioneer Adventists. Again we ask, has the Seventh-day
Adventist Church been faithful to the message of trust given to her? Can the Church give up the
three angel’s messages and still be considered faithful? To these two most important questions
we must sadly answer, no, no. Has the contemporary Seventh-day Adventist Church joined
hands with the enemy? Oh, how sadly we must answer, yes!
“How is the faithful city [Church] become an harlot!” an angel said to Ellen White in vision.
“My Father’s house is made a house of merchandise, a place whence the divine presence and glory
have departed! For this cause there is weakness, and strength is lacking.” (Testimonies for the
Church, Vol. 8, p. 250, emphasis supplied).
In the balances of the sanctuary the Seventh-day Adventist church is to be weighed. She will be judged by
the privileges and advantages that she has had. If her spiritual experience does not correspond to the
advantages that Christ, at infinite cost, has bestowed on her, if the blessings conferred have not qualified
her to do the work entrusted to her, on her will be pronounced the sentence: “Found wanting.” By the
light bestowed, the opportunities given, will she be judged.
Ellen G. White, Testimonies for the Church, vol. 8, page 247 (April 21, 1903). (emphasis supplied).
“Let the sin of deceit and false witness be entertained by a church that has had great light, great
evidence,” Ellen White counsels, “and that church will discard the message the Lord has sent, and
receive the most unreasonable assertions and false suppositions and false theories. Satan laughs at their
folly, for he knows what truth is.” (Testimonies to Ministers, page 409, emphasis supplied).
Oh, may the Lord of the Sabbath, our High Priest in the Heavenly Sanctuary,
have mercy on His people – and may we not be found wanting!
Chapter 12 The Ultimate Betrayal (CONCLUDED).
The church is God's fortress, His city of refuge, which He holds in a revolted world. Any betrayal of the church is treachery to Him who has bought mankind with the blood of His only-begotten Son. From the beginning, faithful souls have constituted the church on earth. In every age the Lord has had His watchmen, who have borne a faithful testimony to the generation in which they lived. These sentinels gave the message of warning; and when they were called to lay off their armor, others took up the work. God brought these witnesses into covenant relation with Himself, uniting the church on earth with the church in heaven. He has sent forth His angels to minister to His church, and the gates of hell have not been able to prevail against His people.
ReplyDeleteThrough centuries of persecution, conflict, and darkness, God has sustained His church. Not one cloud has fallen upon it that He has not prepared for; not one opposing force has risen to counterwork His work, that He has not foreseen. All has taken place as He predicted. He has not left His church forsaken, but has traced in prophetic declarations what would occur, and that which His Spirit inspired the prophets to foretell has been brought about. All His purposes will be fulfilled. His law is linked with His throne, and no power of evil can destroy it. Truth is inspired and guarded by God; and it will triumph over all opposition. Acts of the apostles, 112 & 113.
From this we see that the Lord requires His people to be particular in carrying out right principles. When they are in trouble He would have them call upon Him, in the place of betraying the cause of God into the hands of unbelievers. It is a betrayal of sacred trust to open before unbelievers the working of God's institutions. In this way false statements are made, and these statements are reported to others. Those who do this counterwork the cause of God. They are adversaries of the truth.—Manuscript 72, 1898. (“Shall Not God Avenge His Own Elect?” June 14, 1898.)
ReplyDeleteHow can men to whom have been committed the living oracles of God appeal to lawyers who are disloyal to God, to settle matters relating to the cause of God? Can we be surprised that more souls are not convinced of the truth when pride, self-love, and self-exaltation make those who claim to believe the truth more like men who have lost their first love than like the children of God?—Manuscript 75, 1898. (“Come Out From Among Them, and Be Ye Separate,” June 16, 1898.)
The saints are to judge the world. Then are they to depend upon the world, and upon the world's lawyers to settle their difficulties? God does not want them to take their troubles to the subjects of the enemy for decision. Let us have confidence in one another.—Manuscript 71, 1903. (“To Every Man His Work,” June 18, 1903.)
To lean upon the arm of the law is a disgrace to Christians; yet this evil has been brought in and cherished among the Lord's chosen people. Worldly principles have been stealthily introduced, until in practice many of our workers are becoming like the Laodiceans—halfhearted, because so much dependence is placed on lawyers and legal documents and agreements. Such a condition of things is abhorrent to God.—Manuscript 128, 1903. (“Wrongdoing to Be Condemned; Righteousness to Be Exalted,” October 4, 1903.)